The POLICEPAY Journal

POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List (Receive new issues by e-mail)

Thursday December 23, 2004

  Matt Barnard, Editor                                                                            (405) 234-2235 

  matt@policepay.net                                                                                 www.policepay.net     

                      

                                                                                                                                     BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

Click on a Headline to skip to the Article.

 

Seattle Police make concessions, give OK to new contract

Fort Wayne Police contract with city hits snag

Louisiana $423 million shortfall in police retirement

Elgin officials, police settle contract dispute

For Delaware county police officers, pay is an issue

St. Petersburg Police sign new three year deal

Huntington, WV adopts new contract with police

Independence gets new work agreement

Policing San Diego

Look At The Last Issue (12/16/04)

 

POLICEPAY.NET Announces Plans for a

CALIFORNIA POLICEPAY.NET INDEX

 

POLICEPAY.NET will be launching a new website that is dedicated to California.  The new site will include city police departments, county sheriff departments, and the state police department.  All of the cities and counties currently on the POLICEPAY and DEPUTYPAY sites will be included.  In addition, we will be adding other California cities that have a population of 50,000 or more.  Currently, our largest 200 cities database includes city of about 100,000 and above.

 

We will also publish a California POLICEPAY Index that includes all of the California law enforcement agencies on the California site.  If you department is not one of the 200 largest cities on the POLICEPAY website and your city has a population greater than 50,000, you can be included by providing us the minimum information to qualify for an Index score.  To see what is required, go to this link www.policepay.net/zcalifornia/required.htm

 

After the California site is online, we will begin a Texas POLICEPAY site.

 

 

Fort Wayne Police contract with city hits snag

Health insurance errors lead to delay

From The Journal Gazette, December 22, 2004

The City Council put off for three weeks a new four-year contract for Fort Wayne police officers Tuesday after finding errors in the deal.

 

The pact calls for 3 percent raises each of the four years, some changes to retiree benefits and a discussion forum to promote communication between union representatives and police administrators.

 

The contract for members of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association, which represents the department’s rank and file, will carry the officers through the next mayoral election and the annexation of much of Aboite Township. The contract goes into effect Jan. 1, though it is not expected to get the council’s approval until Jan. 11.

 

The delay came after Councilman Don Schmidt, R-2nd, discovered errors in the amounts officers would pay for health insurance. Officers are supposed to pay the same as non-union city employees, but the figures did not match.

 

The delay is mostly a formality, as the Tuesday meeting was only a committee meeting to give the contract preliminary approval. Final approval could not come before Jan. 11 anyway.

 

Police Chief Rusty York said the negotiations and resulting contract went well.

 

“I thought the whole process was very constructive,” York told the council. “It was just a good-faith negotiation.”

 

The Fraternal Order of Police, which represents officers with the rank of sergeant and higher in the department, will vote on a similar contract at the end of this month.

 

PBA members voted 163-16 to approve the contract Dec. 2, union president Hollis Burton said. About half of the membership voted.

 

The contract will give officers a 3 percent pay raise and $200 extra for their annual uniform allowance, a change the union had been pushing for. Officers currently receive $1,500 a year to defray the cost of maintaining their uniforms, but that amount had not increased in several contract cycles.

 

Burton and the union asked for a total of $2,000 a year for uniforms but the administration offered $1,700.

 

Still, Burton said, he is pleased with the increase. A first-year police officer earned a base pay of $37,492 in 2004.

Officers will also see the extra money show up on their paychecks a month earlier than in previous years. They will receive uniform money in April and October – times when police normally switch between their summer and winter uniforms, Burton said.

When Burton took over as union president this fall, his main priority was improving relations between the union and administration. Relations with the mayor’s office were strained last year when the union endorsed mayoral candidate Linda Buskirk and not the incumbent Graham Richard.

 

Burton suggested a labor management committee that would meet regularly to discuss problems and issues as they arise instead of waiting every two or three years when contracts are up. The committee was added into the contract this time around.

 

The chief or the assistant chief of police, a deputy chief, the PBA president and a member of the union executive board will sit on the committee. The contract calls for the labor management committee to meet once a quarter, but Burton said he hopes it’ll meet as often as each month.

 

Next year, Burton expects the committee will tackle issues such as changing the selection process to the detective bureau. Burton said he would like to see the role of detective be a promotion in rank and make the process be more selective.

 

The committee will also explore what improvements can be made to three police outposts and how the Aboite Township annexation will change patrol districts in the city’s southwest.

 

During the last round of negotiations in 2001, both the PBA and the Fraternal Order of Police were concerned about possible changes in their insurance and insurance coverage for retirees. Retiree benefits took a high priority for the FOP again this year, president Jack Woodruff said.

 

 

Louisiana $423 million shortfall in police retirement
From the Advocate, December 20, 2004

A Louisiana police retirement system is now more than $423 million short of what it needs to pay the benefits of all its members.

The unfunded accrued liability for the Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, or MPERS, swelled by $44 million this year from $379 million last year -- and more than doubled from $195 million two years ago.

That's the difference between the money in the fund and the amount needed to pay the anticipated pensions of its members.

MPERS Actuary Charles Hall -- who calculates risks, premiums and other statistics for the retirement system -- said the increase was expected.

Hall said a recent demographic study established new averages for the life expectancy, salary growth, disabilities and other characteristics of retirement-system members.

That review -- which is conducted every five years -- found, for example, that retirees and family members who also receive benefits were living longer than previously thought.

"We did expect the unfunded liability to increase for that reason and it did," Hall said. "People are living longer because of improvements in health care."

Hall said losses in the stock market also have added to the funding gap. MPERS lost $200 million over a two-year period, but has since gained it back.

MPERS manages more than $1 billion in retirement assets for 9,500 full-time police department employees throughout Louisiana.

Baton Rouge and other cities now pay 21.5 percent of their payrolls to fund the retirement system -- up from 9 percent just three years ago. MPERS trustees decided last week to drop next year's rate to 20.25 percent.

The growing gap means retirees won't get a cost-of-living increase again next year because of a state requirement that the system have 95 percent of the money needed to pay the anticipated pensions of its members. Currently, MPERS can pay less than 73 percent of the pensions.

Hall said "the gap is so large that we'll never be able to grant a cost-of-living increase" because of that requirement.

 

 

 

For Delaware county police officers, pay is an issue

From the Star Press, December 19, 2004

 

MUNCIE - Delaware County sheriff's deputies aren't paid a competitive wage, and that affects the department's ability to attract and retain officers, Sheriff George Sheridan says.

 

A Star Press survey of Indiana counties of comparable size showed that the $32,551 salary for starting road deputies in Delaware County was less than the salaries paid in Madison, Johnson and LaPorte counties but slightly more than Hendricks and Vigo counties.

 

"If you're looking at five to six counties in Indiana, Illinois and Michigan, we're about $8,000 in the hole," Sheridan said.

 

County police officer Todd Dailey is the chairman of United Auto Workers Local 321.

The union represents county police officers and some other local emergency services employees. Dailey said the union and Sheridan "are on the same page."

 

"It's gotten to the point where the sheriff's office can't attract any significant number of applicants," Dailey said. "And I'm pretty sure we've got some officers who have been here up to 10 years that are looking at going elsewhere. That would be a significant blow."

 

Dailey said he has serious concerns about what this will mean to the Delaware County Police Department.

 

"If you look at all the new subdivisions that are going into unincorporated areas, the number of persons the sheriff's office is servicing is not shrinking," he said.

 

Delaware County Council sets budgets for county departments, including pay for deputies.

 

But some council members have not recently shown much inclination to make better pay available.

 

In a special council meeting on Nov. 30, only four of seven council members showed up to hear Dailey and fellow officer David Hanauer talk about pay for "special teams" - officers with special skills who fulfill investigatory or rescue roles, like scuba diving.

The officers asked that less than $14,000 be appropriated for retroactive 2004 pay for those special teams.

 

Council members were unwilling to even make a motion to consider the pay.

"It didn't come on the floor," council member Ron Quakenbush recalled. "Nobody made a motion to approve or disapprove. It just didn't get any farther than that."

Quakenbush noted that council did approve that special teams spending in the 2005 budget.

 

Some people contacted by The Star Press wonder if the fate of the county police department is really that dire.

 

Bill Engelbrecht, a retired Ontario Systems executive, was on the Delaware County sheriff merit commission for more than 30 years. He served on the board that helped decide hiring and promotion issues for sheriffs ranging from Harry Howard in the 1960s to Steve Aul in the 1990s.

 

Engelbrecht noted that his observations were based solely on the state of the department prior to his departure from the board more than 10 years ago.

 

As for difficulty finding patrol officers, Engelbrecht said, "They could easily fill any opening they had, 10 times over. I know we didn't have a big turnover.

 

"The number of complaints was minimal. The guys were content all the time I was on the merit board."

 

Engelbrecht said that it didn't seem obvious that more patrol officers were needed.

"They seem to get the job done. If there was crime not being taken care of, you would want to increase it, but it seems under control."

 

Quakenbush said council members are sympathetic to county police officers.

"We'd like to give them more money if it was available," Quakenbush said. "But they're not the lowest paid deputies in the state.

 

"I'm not saying they don't deserve it. But we have a budget to balance."

 

 

Seattle Police make concessions, give OK to new contract

From the SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER, December 22, 2004

 

Seattle police officers approved a new contract that will require them for the first time to pay a portion of their health care coverage and work under greater public scrutiny.

 

Yesterday, the Seattle Police Officers' Guild and city officials announced that the 1,100 officers in the guild voted to approve the contract.

 

"We're happy about this," Deputy Mayor Tim Ceis said yesterday. "I don't think the guild got everything it wanted, but neither did the city."

 

Chief Gil Kerlikowske issued a brief statement, saying the contract "recognized the professionalism of our officers and the difficult and dangerous job they perform for our community."

 

Sgt. Kevin Haistings, president of the Seattle Police Officers' Guild, was guarded in his characterization of the new contract, saying officers can live with it.

 

"It's certainly not where we thought we'd be," Haistings said. "This is a labor town. People know what it's like at the table. It wasn't all fun and games."

 

The contract provides for a raise of 9.5 percent over the next four years and requires police to pay 5 percent of the monthly cost of their health insurance. Officer accountability was also a bargaining issue, and the contract now calls for creating a voluntary mediation process for citizen complaints against officers.

 

"There are some new things we think are positive for accountability," Ceis said.

The contract must still be approved by the City Council.

 

 

 

 

Elgin officials, police settle contract dispute
From the Daily Herald, December 17, 2004

The tense standoff between Elgin police officers and city officials who sign their paychecks has ended.

The police union and top city administrators have reached a "tentative agreement" on the terms of the officers' contracts, said Rick Ciganek, police union president.

The city council still must approve the deal.

Under the proposed contract, the 140 union members will receive a 4.5 percent raise for 2004, another 4.5 percent raise for 2005 and a 4 percent raise for 2006. The 2004 raise would be paid retroactively to the start of the year.

In exchange, the police officers will pay 7.5 percent of their health-care benefit costs. They now pay none.

"Our members have ratified it; now, it's in the hands of the city council," Ciganek said.

The police officers have been working without a contract since the end of 2003 when their last one expired. Sometimes-heated talks between the two sides broke down months ago over pay and medical benefits and an arbitrator was expected to decide the case within a few months.

The union and city officials returned to the table recently and struck a compromise so arbitration could be avoided. But Ciganek said Elgin's officers still won't be paid as much as those in comparably sized communities with similar amounts of crime.

"We were asking to be on track with Aurora, but this doesn't really get us there," Ciganek said. "It's a step in the right direction."

City Manager David Dorgan could not be immediately reached for comment.

But throughout the negotiations he insisted that police officers contribute something toward their medical benefits to help offset the skyrocketing cost of health-care insurance to the city. Elgin is one of few municipalities that provides free benefits to all its employees.

The police union conceding that perk clears the way for the city to begin having the same expectation of other employees and unions.

In recent months, the police union increased pressure on Dorgan, picketing outside city hall with their family members and speaking out at city council meetings. The union even had put up a large sign near the center of downtown criticizing the city for not agreeing to their contract terms.

The lengthy tug of war between the police union and city hall is not new, as the officers' previous contract had to be determined by an arbitrator since the two sides never could reach a deal.

The city remains in negotiations with the firefighters union about its next contract.

Pact: Free benefits may end for all in Elgin

 

 

Police work agreement is approved for Independence

From The Kansas City Star, December 15, 2004

About 200 Independence Police Department employees have a new work agreement.

The Independence City Council approved the three-year pact Monday night, retroactive to July 1. Many employees will receive a 2.5 percent increase, said City Manager Robert Heacock, plus a “longevity” increase of 0.5 percent. In addition, a “market adjustment” of 1 percent will be awarded in January.

Carl Perry, president of the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 1, representing Independence officers, said the department's rank and file were satisfied to have a deal in place.

“I am very pleased that this is finally over,” Perry said. “It was a long and difficult negotiation, but we are pleased that we are back under the protection of the work agreement.”

Police employees were among the most visible Independence staff members frustrated about a city budget, passed in 2003, that included no employee pay raises. Lodge members often appeared in the City Council chambers carrying signs protesting the decision, which, city officials believed, had to be made because of flat revenues.

Heacock, meanwhile, congratulated Perry and others involved in the labor talks.

“This was a difficult work agreement to resolve, but I think it addresses a number of concerns,” he said.

One of those concerns, he said, was the success with which the city was able to compete for new, high-quality officers.

“Recently we had slipped out of competitiveness with other jurisdictions in our area for those new hires,” Heacock said.

The agreement also adjusts salaries on the top end of the officer pay scale.

The lowest three steps of the “police officer” classification will be deleted, and three steps will be added to the top of the wage scale for those classified as “master police officer.”

The agreement runs through June 30, 2007.

 

 

Huntington, WV adopts new contract with police

FOP concedes to city paying for 80 percent of health insurance

From The Herald-Dispatch, December 14, 2004

 

HUNTINGTON -- Huntington City Council adopted a new Police Department union contract Monday that will help the city save thousands in health insurance costs, but will cost about $1 million more than the union’s previous four-year contract.

 

The council voted 9-1 to adopt the contract, which was approved unanimously earlier this month by members of Fraternal Order of Police Gold Star Lodge 65. Councilman Cal Kent voted against the contract, while Councilman Tom McCallister was not present for the vote.

 

The contract adoption comes after months of stalled negotiations between union members and Mayor David Felinton’s administration, with some heated exchanges during the interim. The FOP’s previous contract expired June 30, but was extended until both sides could agree on a new contract.

 

"This is a contract that is good for the officers and the residents as well," Felinton said. "This will bring the last group of city employees in line with health care concessions, which we think will save us a lot over the long run."

 

The FOP’s contract is the third and final step by the city to reduce health insurance costs, which have been a key factor in Huntington’s financial struggles.

 

A 2002 study by Huntington Forward, a group of local business leaders and citizens, reported the city’s health insurance plan was too expensive and unrealistic in today’s economy.

 

The medical insurance plan in the FOP’s contract is identical to the one city firefighters and city employees who belong to American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 598 approved earlier this year.

 

Under the FOP’s previous contract, the city paid 100 percent of most health insurance costs. Under the new contract, the city will pay for only 80 percent of the costs, while union members will pick up the remaining 20 percent.

 

In addition, monthly deductibles for most medical services will increase from $100 per person to $250 per person. The new contract also requires union members to pay monthly premiums of $25 for family coverage and $12 for single coverage.

 

How much the health care concessions in the contracts will save the city is not known, city Personnel Director Sherry Lewis said. In March, Blue-Cross-Blue Shield, which acts as a third party administrator for the city, estimated the city would save $350,000 in the first year of the new contracts.

 

"The bulk of the savings occurs in the first year of the contracts," Lewis said. "We wouldn’t see $350,000 in annual savings during the final three years of the contracts."

 

In return for health insurance concessions, the FOP’s contract calls for pay raises ranging from 8.4 percent to 11 percent during the first year. Annual pay raises in the remaining three years of the contract ranges from 3 percent to 4.4 percent. Overall, pay raises in the new contract will cost the city $437,000 more than what it paid in salaries under the previous contract.

 

Alan Rohrig, chairman of the pay raise committee for the FOP, said the raises are similar to what Huntington firefighters received in their contract and help compensate for the health insurance concessions the union made.

 

"We never like to take a step back when it comes to health insurance coverage, but in this day and age, it’s a reality," Rohrig said.

 

Because the contract will cost the city an additional $1 million over the next four years, it will be difficult to hire more police officers, Kent said. The fact that the city’s revenue sources have remained relatively flat during the past several years makes it even more of a challenge, he said.

 

Kent said he supports giving officers raises, but not at the approved levels.

 

 

Policing San Diego

From the UNION-TRIBUNE, December 12, 2004

Law enforcement in San Diego encompasses a central paradox. The city currently has 1,990 sworn police officers (62 recruits are currently training at the police academy) serving a population of 1.29 million San Diegans. That translates to 1.65 police per 1,000 citizens. That ratio ranks San Diego dead last among the nation's 10 largest cities in the proportional size of its police force.

The paradox is that in the same list of the 10 largest U.S. cities in 2003, San Diego had the second lowest overall crime rate (as measured by the FBI's Uniform Crime Index) per 1,000 citizens. What's more, San Diego recorded the lowest rate of violent crime among the nation's 10 largest cities in 2003.

Surprisingly, if not stunningly, the one major city in the United States with a population over 1 million with a lower overall crime rate than San Diego per 1,000 citizens is New York City. In 2003, New York City had 29.22 major crimes per 1,000 citizens. The crime figure for San Diego per 1,000 citizens last year was 42.15.

Norm Stamper, a deputy police chief here in the 1980s and later police chief in Seattle, calls San Diego "a dangerously under-policed city."

Stamper, who started with the SDPD as a beat cop in the 1960s, warns bluntly of the need for a larger police force here.

"It's a city of 400 square miles. San Diego has far too few police officers to do a good job of even traditional policing. San Diego's police force is as small or smaller proportionally than any big city in the country," Stamper adds.

William M. Lansdowne, San Diego's new police chief, dismisses any suggestion that the city is perilously underpoliced. But Lansdowne acknowledges that more police are needed here. His strategic plan calls for adding 300 new police officers over the next 10 years and adding about 100 additional officers by 2006.

Mayor Dick Murphy, referring to the city's ratio of police officers to residents, told the Union-Tribune's editorial board during the recent mayoral campaign that "I think 1.65 can get the job done. I think that a higher ratio would do a better job."

Former San Diego police chief Bill Kolender, now San Diego County Sheriff, says city officials repeatedly promised him that they would raise the ratio of police officers per 1,000 citizens to 2. "It never happened," Kolender notes. Indeed, the Police Department's statistics dating to the 1960s show that the ratio of about 1.6 officers per 1,000 citizens has remained remarkably constant here for 40 years.

New York City has 4.61 officers for each 1,000 citizens, Los Angeles 2.36, Philadelphia 4.55, Houston 2.63, Chicago 4.63, Dallas 2.29 and Phoenix 1.97. Among the 10 largest U.S. cities, only Las Vegas Metro at 1.69 and San Antonio at 1.70 have police-to-citizen ratios nearly as low as San Diego's.

How many police officers does San Diego need?

"Four thousand," Stamper snaps.

Bill Farrar, the San Diego cop who is now president of the police union (known formally as the San Diego Police Officers Association) calls the department's staffing shortage, "as bad as I've ever seen it.

"Of the 30 cities of 500,000 or more population, San Diego ranks 29th in numbers of police. San Diego should have two officers per thousand population; that's always been the goal, or 2.5."

Farrar cites a litany of other SDPD deficiencies.

"Most cities have an 80,000-mile limit for their police cars. San Diego police are driving cars that average 120,000 miles. The cars have mechanical problems. We're down 100 cars. We went four years without buying any cars.

"Our police computers, MDTs, are so old nobody makes parts for them anymore. They belong in a police museum somewhere," Farrar says.

Farrar also notes that police pay in San Diego has long lagged behind that for California's 10 largest cities. "We're always at the bottom of that list," Farrar notes, even as he acknowledges that the current contract boosts police base pay 11 percent over a two-year period. Police salaries in Los Angeles average $18,000 more per year than in San Diego and in San Jose $20,000 per year.

San Diego City Councilman Brian Maienschein, chairman of the council's Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee, lauds the city's police for doing an "outstanding job" and cites San Diego's low crimes rates as proof.

But Maienschein agrees that the city needs more police. How many more? "There is no magic number," says the 5th District councilman. In defense of the city, Maienschein points to current plans adding $100 million in new funding to police and fire forces over 10 years, including $10 million more this year.

In the meantime, Maienschein praises Lansdowne for his policy of finding ways to "get more out of what you have."

Lansdowne, a consensus hire recruited by the city in 2003 on the strength of his success as police chief in San Jose, chooses his words carefully in making his case for bringing the force to 2,100 by 2006 and adding a net of 300 police to the force over the next decade. Lansdowne knows he is part of a city team that includes the mayor, city manager and City Council.

With each additional police officer costing the city about $100,000 a year in salary, pension obligations, training, equipment and medical insurance, adding 300 more cops is a major investment; all the more so when San Diego's municipal finances are under considerable strain.

Lansdowne, as the newly arrived police chief in a city suffering obvious financial distress, is understandably reluctant to dwell on the SDPD's staffing and equipment deficiencies. But his own description for his strategic plan is revealing.

Asked for the top item on his agenda, Lansdowne says: "Putting together a strategy for rebuilding the department." Rebuilding is the operative word for a department that virtually everyone agrees has too few cops, outdated equipment and that clearly has been underfunded for years.

And what is a priority goal in Lansdowne's strategic plan? "Staffing," says the chief.

"Over the next decade, we'll need another 300 officers and 70 civilians," Lansdowne says. By 2006, Lansdowne plans to bolster the force sufficiently to reach the department's authorized strength of 2,100 officers. The department has also resumed purchasing new police cars and is gradually replacing its outmoded vehicle computers.

The police hiring freeze that saw San Diego go 15 months during 2003-04 without any hiring is over. The regional police academy classes now include 62 SDPD recruits.

The department is also buying what Lansdowne calls the "right kind of less-lethal equipment," including Taser devices. That's part of a larger effort that includes improved training and supervision to reduce what some see as the most serious blot on the SDPD's professional reputation – the incidence of police shootings in circumstances where non-lethal force might suffice.

Nearly all patrol officers now carry non-lethal beanbag shotguns in the trunks of their patrol cars. New department policy also calls for supervising sergeants to be dispatched to the scene immediately in circumstances where patrol officers may face a choice of using deadly or non-lethal force. The result, says Lansdowne, is a sharp decline in officer-involved shootings.

But no amount of improved training and supervision can compensate entirely for the San Diego Police Department's lack of numbers. In ways large and small, the shortage of police officers presents recurring problems to the police and to the people of San Diego.

Nowhere are those problems more apparent than in the department's struggle to sustain a policing innovation that gave the SDPD a national and international reputation. Originally known as community oriented policing, its current label in the department is problem-oriented policing, POPS, or sometimes neighborhood oriented policing.

"It's a philosophy, not a program," says Norm Stamper, who first advocated a version of community oriented policing as an SDPD lieutenant in the early 1970s. Stamper's inspired, some would say revolutionary, concept was to make the police less reactive and more proactive. That translated to working with citizens in San Diego's neighborhoods to get them involved, in effect, as citizen partners with the police in fighting crime in their own communities.

The proactive part involved citizen-police partnerships that work to identify and solve potential law enforcement problems before they escalate.

Developed in fits and starts during the 1970s, community oriented policing was firmly established as SDPD policy in the 1980s and continued in successive evolutions through the 1990s and into the current decade. Stamper credits former Chief Bill Kolender and his successor, Bob Burgreen, with anchoring community oriented policing in SDPD practice and doctrine.

The measure of this remarkable policing innovation's success is that it has been adopted in one form or another by more than 80 percent of the police departments in the United States. The U.S. Department of Justice has an office in Washington specifically to promote community oriented policing and assist local police departments in adopting the concept.

Community policing also has spread internationally. Foreign police departments in Europe, Latin America and Asia have sent police observers here to study the ways in which the SDPD enlists and joins forces with citizens and communities to fight crime.

In San Diego, the tangible signs of community oriented policing are undeniably impressive: a network of 16 storefront neighborhood police offices throughout the city, teams of trained community service officers, plus nearly 800 members of San Diego's Retired Senior Volunteer Patrol.

The uniformed but unpaid RSVP members patrol neighborhoods in radio-equipped marked cars, provide a law enforcement presence, take routine reports from citizens, do fingerprinting in non-criminal cases, perform vacation checks on unoccupied homes and visit invalids who might require assistance. All this provides invaluable help to the police and to San Diego residents, not least by relieving the police of routine chores that don't have to be performed by sworn officers. Yet, by any measure, there are still too few San Diego police officers to fully implement the community policing concept.

Lansdowne estimates that proper implementation of what he calls "problem oriented policing" should occupy 40 percent of a police officer's time.

"At full staffing, we could do that. We can't now," admits Lansdowne. Out on the streets, police are virtually unanimous in complaining that they lack the time and numbers to do community policing the way they would like to. Officer after officer interviewed for this project cited examples of proactive work they could be doing in neighborhoods if only their numbers permitted more time away from radio calls.

Decades ago, police often disparaged community policing as "social work." Today there is near-universal support among police for this widely successful law enforcement innovation.

What's lacking now in San Diego are the numbers of police officers needed to take full advantage of a pioneering law enforcement innovation that gave this city's police department a national and international reputation.

Sgt. Wesley Albers, a seasoned SDPD cop with 15 years on the force who is currently assigned to Southern Division, spoke words echoed by officer after officer on the subject of community policing.

"The essence of community policing is problem solving. We love the concept but you have to have the resources. When we are at minimum staffing or near minimum staffing, we can't do that," Albers says.

Exactly how many more police should be added to San Diego's force of 1,990 sworn officers can be debated. But there is consensus that many more officers are needed.

It's true, of course, that the size of the police force isn't the sole determinant of a city's crime rate. Some experts even assert that there is no provable correlation between crime rates and the numbers of police. Culture, family structure and stability, religious faith, demographics, socio-economic conditions, the quality of education, investment in public services and infrastructure, civic institutions and strong civic leadership are all key factors in the complex matrix that determines a city's crime rate.

But just as obviously, effective policing is vital to containing crime. Cops are the front line in the permanent battle against criminals. Waging that battle successfully requires a police force that is well trained and equipped, well led, guided by an effective crime-fighting strategy and large enough for the job at hand.

By any measure, San Diego's police force is stretched very thin. That salient fact coupled with the city's comparatively low crime rate is why San Diego police talk frequently of their success in "doing more with less."

Sgt. Albers says he chose to apply to the San Diego Police Department the day he graduated from college in Minnesota in 1989. Why? Because, he says, "San Diego has the best major metropolitan police department in the country."

The decade of falling crime rates here from 1992 to 2002, the near-total absence of police corruption and the internationally recognized innovation of community oriented policing would appear to vindicate that judgment.

But, as noted, there is consensus on the need for a larger police force. "We need more people," Albers says flatly.

"More police equal more public safety. Response times are less. We try for two officers per call. At minimum staffing we can't always do that. At minimum staffing, it can be 20 minutes to your closest cover unit," he adds.

"How many cops are enough?" Albers asks rhetorically. "Who knows? But we do know what happens when we don't have enough."

 

 

Officers win 3 years of pay raises

After lengthy negotiations, the police rank-and-file agree to a 4 percent increase this fiscal year; in the next two years, they will get 5.5 percent raises.

St. Petersburg Times, December 11, 2004

 

ST. PETERSBURG - Police officers have finally struck a deal with city leaders, ending a contentious salary dispute.

 

After almost a year of negotiating, nearly a dozen meetings, and many offers and counteroffers, a majority of St. Petersburg police officers agreed Friday to a three-year contract.

 

Officers will receive a 4 percent increase this fiscal year, and a 5.5 percent raise for each of the ensuing two years, council member Bill Foster said.

 

"I think all parties are glad to put this behind us," Foster said, "and now we can look toward a brighter future."

 

Patrol officers in the Police Benevolent Association voted on the contract Friday, approving it by a margin of about three to one, said Andy Houston, the city's director of internal services. Police supervisors, represented by the Fraternal Order of Police, had already approved roughly the same terms, Houston said.

 

The city council signed off on the FOP agreement on Thursday, and is scheduled to address the PBA contract during their meeting this Thursday, Foster said. He predicted it would pass with little discussion.

Union leaders could not be reached for comment Friday evening.

 

Union and city officials have been working since January to craft a three-year contract for officers. The union originally requested the largest pay raise ever - a 10 percent increase each year for three years. The city rejected that and countered with a 3.5 percent raise. The bargaining continued through November.

 

Police officers have complained that low pay was contributing to a flood of officers leaving the department for other agencies, with more than 80 leaving this year, according to union leaders. City officials said they have tried to address the problem with a variety of benefits: take-home patrol cars, interest-free home loans.

 

Currently, entry level officers in St. Petersburg earn $34,810 annually. Clearwater pays its rookies $38,014, and the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office pays $36,705.

 

This year's raise will be retroactive to October, the beginning of the fiscal year that ends in September.

Foster hopes the new agreement will help keep good officers. "This will keep us competitive," he said. "As long as we maintain a good competitive collective bargaining package, we will slow down any exodus."

 

 

 

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2004 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net