The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday December 8, 2005

POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List (Receive new issues by e-mail)   www.policepay.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

                                                                                                                                       BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

2006 OUTLOOK FOR NEGOTIATIONS

ORDER A COPY TODAY (It is free)

(click on the Link above)

POLICEPAY.NET

NEW PENSION AND INSURANCE CALCULATORS FOR NEGOTIATIONS

SYRACUSE, NY

Police Can Plan On Extra Money

NASHVILLE, TN

Teamsters Calls For Ouster Of Serpas

NASHVILLE, TN

Police Vote To Remove FOP As Their Union

ST. PAUL, MN

Police Contract Calls For Pay Increases

SEABROOK, NH

Police Contract Near To Ratification

LA CROSSE, WI

City Police, Fire, Transit Unions Taking Contracts To Members

POLICEPAY.NET

WHAT TO SAY AND DO BEFORE NEGOTIATIONS

Look At The Last Issue (12/1/05)

 

Police can plan on extra money

Extra checks reflect award of retroactive wages and benefits in Syracuse.

From The Post-Standard, December 02, 2005

 

Shortly after the holidays, every single member of the Syracuse Police Department is likely to get a check for at least $1,300.

The money which city officials say could be as much as $6,000 for some officers won't be a belated Christmas bonus.

 

It will be payment for a series of retroactive wage hikes and benefits awarded to the city police union by a state arbitrator.

 

The new police contract is expected to cost the city about $5.8 million in this budget year alone, city Administration Director Ken Mokrzycki said.

 

That's a problem, because the city only set aside about $5.2 million to cover pay hikes stemming from contract negotiations with all of the city's labor unions, Mokrzycki said.

 

"This is a third higher than what we anticipated," Mokrzycki said Thursday of the arbitrator's ruling on the police contract. "It clearly exceeds what we have in our budget, and we will have to go into our fund balance to pay for it."

 

The Syracuse Common Council is expected to vote Monday on the contract that would give the department's 490 officers an 8-percent hike over two years.

 

That increase is better than the officers received in the last arbitrator's ruling, which gave them a 7-percent raise for 2002 and 2003, city records show. An arbitrator's ruling covering the two years before that gave the officers an 6-percent increase.

 

Syracuse police have been working for nearly two years without a contract. The arbitrator's decision will get them to Jan. 1, and then city administrators and police negotiators will have to go back to the table for a 2006 contract.

 

Dan Jones, vice president of the Syracuse Police Benevolent Association, said the insufficient amount budgeted for police raises by the city this year was the product of "wishful thinking" by cash-strapped city administrators.

 

"In one sense, you can see the city's point; it's tough when you don't have a lot of money," Jones said. "But being a cop in Syracuse is pretty dangerous. Officers are getting beat up all the time. And we're still behind what the police are making in other cities; in Rochester, Buffalo and Albany."

 

The new deal, which covers 2004 and 2005, calls for 2-percent raises every six months of the contract.

 

The new salary level would be jump-started by the retroactive paycheck, which will vary, depending on individual officer's pay rates. Base pay for officers now ranges from $32,688 to $49,008, city budget figures show.

 

The arbitrator's contract also raises officers' annual uniform allowance from $700 to $1,200, and includes a brand new benefit that could let officers cash in unused sick days for thousands of dollars in cash when they retire from the force.

 

"The police historically have gone to an arbitrator and made out well," said Bill Ryan, chairman of the council's Public Safety Committee. "It's a serious problem. Police officers have got a tough job, but that's not really the issue. The issue to me is, what can we afford? We can't get the arbitrator to consider that. "

 

Jones noted that not all new provisions in the contract favor the officers.

 

Officers will have to increase their monthly health insurance co-payment from $25 to $30 month for family plans and from $10 to $15 for individuals. Their co-payment for prescription drugs would rise from $15 to $20 under the new deal.

 

That's the same change in health insurance benefits city officials are negotiating into contracts with other city unions.

 

 

Teamsters calls for ouster of Serpas

Union that's seeking representation of Metro officers blames chief for rising crime and declining morale
From the Tennessean, December 8, 2005

 

Less than a week after forcing an election that could make it the labor union for Nashville police officers, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters called for the ouster of Metro Police Chief Ronal Serpas, blaming him for rising crime and falling morale within the department.

 

"It is clear that Serpas is more concerned about Serpas than the city of Nashville, and it's time for him to go," said Jesse Case, the Teamsters' chief local organizer in charge of the union's push to take over as the bargaining agent for Metro police officers.

 

On Dec. 1, more than 600 officers went to the polls and voted to decertify their representative group, the Fraternal Order of Police. The vote followed a campaign by the Teamsters that tapped into many officers' disapproval of policies enacted by Serpas since his hiring in January 2004.

 

Officials at both unions have pointed to the results of the election as a clear sign of dissatisfaction with Serpas.

 

"I think it was that low morale that drove the decertification vote," said Brock Parks, executive director of the FOP. "It's quite clear that (Serpas') policies, his philosophies, his methods have spurred the dissatisfaction within the police department."

 

A police spokesman said Serpas had not heard about the unions' assertions directly and would not comment.

 

Nashville Mayor Bill Purcell said he stands behind the chief. "The mayor supports Chief Serpas," said Molly Sudderth, Purcell's spokeswoman.

 

Teamsters officials also called on the FOP to support Serpas' removal. FOP officials declined to say whether the union would back the chief's removal.

 

"If there is such a move, we would have to look into the viability of it," said Parks, the FOP's executive director. "I don't want to jump on board of an empty plan or promise."

 

Parks, however, said the union agrees that changes are needed to fix a range of issues that have repeatedly been raised by rank-and-file officers. Officers have said Serpas is too reliant on statistics, heavy-handed in disciplinary matters and not sufficiently responsive to issues of officer safety.

 

After Serpas was hired, the number of traffic stops soared. Some Metro officers claim they're forced to write too many traffic tickets to avoid being reprimanded.

 

Other officers have complained about having personal police cruisers taken away, work shifts changed and vacation days taken away for not meeting the department's traffic citation quotas. Serpas has denied the existence of quotas and said he merely insists that officers put in a solid day's work.

 

Last month, the Teamsters brought two officials from the Washington State Patrol Troopers Association to Nashville to talk with local officers. The troopers from Washington, where Serpas was chief before taking the Nashville job, said officers there had similar complaints about the chief's methods.

 

Also last month, the FOP filed a lawsuit against the police department claiming that Mission One — an initiative brought by Serpas that requires all officers to patrol in uniform at least once a month — endangers the safety of undercover officers.

 

Metro's officers will head to the polls early next year to decide between the FOP and the Teamsters. Last year, the Teamsters were defeated by the FOP in a similar election by just 16 votes.

 

FOP officials have said the Teamsters make false promises to win favor with Metro officers and that this push to remove Serpas could be another ploy. Teamsters officials insisted that their effort to oust Serpas is serious.

 

"The difference between the FOP and the Teamsters is we will fight to the end for something we believe in," the Teamsters' Case said.

"We're not going to back down from Serpas or anybody else. The FOP needs to fight with us or get out of the way."

 

Teamsters officials said their campaign will promote public awareness about Metro officers' dissatisfaction and the impact of the low morale on the city's crime rate. Nashville has recorded 96 killings so far this year, up from just 58 a year ago.

 

Teamsters officials will attend Serpas' public appearances to monitor what he says and get their own message out, Case said.

"The murder rate proves that Serpas' method of management is a failure," Case said. "Everyone talks about it in Nashville, no one is saying it publicly, but it's time for the man to go."

 

 

Police vote to remove FOP as their union
Teamsters say they will ask for representation election

From the Tennessean, December 2, 2005

Metro police officers voted yesterday to remove the Fraternal Order of Police as their union after 27 years.

 

According to an unofficial count, 634 sworn officers voted to decertify the organization, out of 674 ballots cast yesterday. Officials said 599 votes from the 1,199 sworn officers in the department were needed to decertify the FOP.

 

"I was surprised at the number of police officers who would choose to decertify the FOP," said Brock Parks, executive director of the organization. "That just shows that the department is still deeply divided."

 

Parks said the FOP advised its supporters not to vote and that the low number of voters showed that the FOP supporters have a strong allegiance to it.

 

Metro officials said it would take five days to make the results of the election official. Then any group that submits a petition with signatures from at least 30% of the sworn officers in Metro can request a new representation election.

 

Officials with the Teamsters union, which wants to represent Metro police, said they planned to file a petition today.

 

Ron Deardorff, assistant director of Human Resources for Metro, conducted yesterday's election, which cost the city more than $20,000. He said he wasn't surprised by the results.

 

"Last year when we had a representation election it was within 16 votes, and this sort of mirrors that," Deardorff said.

 

The FOP has battled to continue to represent officers in Metro, but many have been won over by the organization's competitor, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters.

 

In 2004, the FOP beat the Teamsters in a representation election by 16 votes out of 1,032 ballots cast. Many involved believe that yesterday's decertification election results are a sign that the FOP might not win a second representation election.

 

Since last year's election, the Teamsters have mounted an aggressive campaign to become the new bargaining agent for the department.

Their efforts are part of a nationwide battle between two unions seeking to get public safety employees into their organizations.

 

Teamsters officials claim that some officers are dissatisfied with the FOP because it hasn't fought hard enough for a new pension plan that Metro officers want.

 

Former FOP president Lt. Calvin Hullett said this election was important for the officers who were fed up with the FOP.

 

It was so important to Hullett that he took a break from his vacation in Salt Lake City, Utah, and flew to Nashville to cast his vote.

"The officers just had that feeling like the FOP had sold them out," he said. "They want a real union. … I think it will be up to the Teamsters to show, when they become the bargaining unit, that there is a brighter side."

 

"We are extremely proud of these officers that came out and showed that they are ready to move forward," said Galen Munroe, a spokesman for the Teamsters.

 

 

Police contract calls for pay increases

From the Pioneer Press, December 8, 2005

 

St. Paul police employees will get a 2.5 percent pay hike under a contract approved Wednesday by the City Council.

 

Under the terms of the one-year deal, personnel who have been with the department from three to nine years will receive an additional 2.5 percent increase. The contract puts the St. Paul Police Department more in line with other metro departments, said Dave Titus, head of the St. Paul Police Federation.

 

Dispatchers will begin receiving the increase in January. Most other employees' raises will go into effect in May.

 

The council also approved a 2004-05 contract for the International Association of Fire Fighters Local 21, which represents much of the city's fire department. The contract — which includes only a retroactive 0.4 percent pay increase for 2004 — was delayed after the city and the union could not come to an agreement. An arbitrator recently sided with the city.

 

The city also approved contracts with trade unions calling for workers to earn prevailing industry wages.

 

 

Police contract near to ratification

From the Hampton Union, December 6, 2005

 

SEABROOK - The Seabrook Police Association contract is close to being ratified, but one issue the union wanted is going before the state Public Employee Labor Relations Board.

 

The police union wanted a process for promotions outlined in the new, three-year contract, according to Jeff Padallaro, the representative for the Seabrook Police Association, Teamsters Local 633.

 

Earlier this year, the union had filed a grievance on the issue after Sgt. Lee Bitomske was promoted to lieutenant.

The union did not want Bitomske taken out of his new position, Padallaro said at the time. It wanted a clear process for promotion outlined.

 

Both sides had agreed to hold the matter for discussion in negotiations.

 

At least one selectman, Cora Stockbridge, felt the issue should not be made a part of contract talks, since it involves two separate unions. A lieutenant’s position is within the town’s supervisory union.

 

"One union cannot negotiate terms and conditions of another contract," said Stockbridge. "There was no resolution to it."

 

The union wanted the issue to go to arbitration. When the town refused, it filed an unfair labor practice.

 

Last month, the Seabrook Board of Selectmen filed its own unfair labor practice charge against the union with the state Public Employees Labor Relations Board in Concord.

 

"There was no vote taken," Stockbridge said. "It was discussed at times during negotiations, at other times discussed as personnel matter."

 

Neither Town Manager Fred Welch nor Chairwoman Karen Knight could be reached on Monday.

 

The PELRB filing will not affect the new contract, which is expected to be ratified by the union and to go before voters.

 

 

City police, fire, transit unions taking contracts to members

From the La Crosse Tribune, December 8, 2005

 

Three unions have reached tentative agreements with the city of La Crosse on two-year contracts, pending votes by their memberships.

The non-supervisory police, firefighters and transit unions all have all agreed to the same contract, Mayor Mark Johnsrud said Wednesday. He would not reveal details but said the contract gives the city some budget relief in the first year.

Johnsrud had proposed the unions forego across-the-board raises in 2006. In initial negotiations, union representatives indicated they would agree if they were guaranteed raises in 2007.

Steve Thornton, police union vice president, and Mike Suchla, president, La Crosse Firefighters Local 127, both said they still have minor details to work out. Thornton said he hopes to take it to members this week, and Suchla said a meeting probably will be held next week. Neither would comment on details until after members ratify a contract.

The Amalgamated Transit Union Local 519 came to a tentative agreement with the city Tuesday and will present it to members Sunday, said Dale Anderson, president.

The Service Employees International Union, which counts 199 of the city’s approximately 520 employees as members, has not reached an agreement, Johnsrud said. He said he hopes SEIU members will have a contract to vote on next week. Steve Reget, president of Local 180, said union negotiators took an offer to members Tuesday and they will vote on a contract Monday.

Police supervisors union negotiators presented their proposal to the mayor Wednesday. They, too, agreed to no across-the-board increases next year, but seek two 2.25 percent increases in 2007, on Jan. 1 and July 1. The proposal also calls for increases in employees’ contributions to health insurance costs.

Johnsrud has asked that contracts be accepted by Jan. 1. Otherwise, he said he would have to lay off about 25 positions to cover a possible 3 percent wage increase.

In addition to the union memberships, he said the La Crosse Common Council needs to vote on the contracts.

 

 

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ă POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2005 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net