The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, October 19, 2006

www.policepayjournal.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

POLICEPAY.NET NEGOTIATION TRAINING                     

                     NOVEMBER 9-10     -      LAS VEGAS 

                    JULY 26-27            -      Santa Fe, NM        (click here for information)

 

POLICEPAY.NET

NEW CONTRACT NEGOTIATION SERVICE

TAMPA, FL

Tentative Deal Would Boost Police Pay

BIRMINGHAM, AL

Confrontation at City Hall

HELENA, MT

Arbitrator sides with city

GWINNETT COUNTY, GA

Public safety officers to get boost in pay

SIOUX FALLS, SD

City dealings with unions under way

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

Tentative Deal Would Boost Police Pay

From The Tampa Tribune, October 10, 2006

TAMPA - The city and the union representing Tampa police have reached a tentative labor agreement that, if ratified, would boost officers' pay about 4 percent in each of the next three years.

 

The West Central Florida Police Benevolent Association posted the proposed contracts for officers, sergeants and lieutenants on its Web site during the weekend. The documents suggest a 4.5 percent raise for the first year and a 4 percent raise for the second and third years.

 

The current contract expired Sept. 30. The proposed contract is scheduled for a vote among union members Oct. 17 and 18, which would make the proposed changes retroactive to Oct. 1.

 

If the contract is approved, officers would earn from $42,286 to $68,681 during this fiscal year and from $45,739 to $74,276 before the contract expires Sept. 30, 2009.

 

Sergeants would earn from $68,681 to $84,302 during this fiscal year and from $74,276 to $91,187 during the contract's third year. Lieutenants would earn from $85,113 to $92,414 during this fiscal year and from $92,060 to $99,964 during the contract's third year.

 

Other proposed changes in the contract include reimbursing officers up to $400 for purchasing their own protective vests instead of using department-issued ones.

 

Union President Kevin Durkin could not be reached for comment Monday. Police Chief Stephen Hogue declined to comment.

 

Confrontation at City Hall

From the Birmingham News, October 14, 2006

 

THE ISSUE: Instead of negotiation, compromise and statesmanship on raises for police officers and firefighters, the mayor and City Council are heading off to court. This isn't what you'd call the best use of Birmingham taxpayers' dollars.

 

Clearly, the Birmingham City Council wants to give a pay raise to police officers and firefighters.

 

Just as clearly, Mayor Bernard Kincaid wants it his way or no way.

 

Something must give - or nothing will get done. Or, if it does get done, it'll happen in a poisoned atmosphere of bitterness and backbiting.

 

Kincaid and members of the City Council should be better than that. They owe citizens and taxpayers more.

 

The City Council, by a 7-1 vote Tuesday, overturned Kincaid's veto of a 15 percent pay raise for police officers and firefighters. Originally, the council approved the raises, set to start in 2008, by an 8-1 vote. Only six votes were needed to override Kincaid's veto.

 

In characteristic form, Kincaid is ignoring the council's will and says he'll take the dispute to court. And the council is not planning to back down. "If he files an action against us, we will vigorously defend our vote," said Council President Carole Smitherman.

 

That will cost taxpayers, since the city's legal department represents both the City Council and the mayor's office. That means an outside attorney will have to be hired. Obviously, there are more constructive ways to use that money, but Kincaid acts more interested in stubbornness than statesmanship.

 

Coming into this latest dispute, there are some knowns:

 

Public safety workers in Birmingham are underpaid compared with many surrounding jurisdictions. Law enforcement agencies nearby pay as much as $10,000 a year more than Birmingham police officers are paid. Even with a 15 percent raise over three years, Birmingham officers and firefighters won't be at the top of the pay scale in this area.

 

Kincaid can't argue he's been blindsided. After three police officers were killed in the line of duty in 2004, Kincaid himself singled out public safety officers for increases:

"We pledge to you that we will work to make our public safety officials, both police and fire in the largest city in Alabama, the highest paid in Alabama." Now, the mayor doesn't want to give raises to one group unless he can give raises to all city workers.

Kincaid says there should be a study to determine how well Birmingham's total pay package, including salary, benefits and pension, stacks up against surrounding cities.

 

Fine. Do it. But it's also fair to ask the mayor why he didn't undertake that study two years ago when he promised police officers and firefighters would be "the highest paid in Alabama."

 

This is the third City Council Kincaid has "worked" with - and it's the third council with which the mayor has had serious disagreement. Kincaid and the council should discuss issues and resolve them with only the best interests of Birmingham in mind instead of continuing to operate in near-constant confrontation.

 

Arbitrator sides with city

From The Independent Record, October 13, 2006

 

An arbitrator has sided with city officials in a drawn-out contract battle with members of Local 2280 of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, which represents Helena police officers.

Arbitrator John Flager wrote in his decision delivered this week that both parties formulated reasonable positions regarding the issues at hand, but the city’s proposal better “melded and blended the various provisions at impasse into a rational and workable whole.”

“We’ve been working for quite some time to get a resolution to this,” said Salty Payne, human resources manager for the city Wednesday, adding that city officials are pleased with the outcome.

Craig Campbell, union president, said the police officers are also happy that the arbitration is complete.

“But we’re disappointed in the ruling,” he said, adding that he questions the rationale of spending $6,000 to pay an arbitrator to take away some benefits that police officers have enjoyed since 1994.

Campbell said the arbitrator’s decisions on some of the issues presented to him will result in Helena police officers falling farther behind other departments of similar size across the state in terms of compensation.

 

According to Payne, contract negotiations between the union and the city began in April 2005, and quickly came to an impasse. Even meetings with a mediator from the Montana Department of Labor couldn’t precipitate any movement in the log jam blocking an agreement.

At that point, the parties decided to pass the case off to an arbitrator for evaluation, and this week’s binding decision is the result of that effort.

According to representatives from both sides, major sticking points for the parties include salary increases, graveyard shift pay, and most controversial, holiday pay.

Under previously negotiated terms, police officers could, with the permission of their supervisors, take time off for credited holiday time or cash out unused holiday credits.

Payne said it was hard to anticipate how many officers would choose to take that route, making it difficult for city officials to properly budget. City officials attempted to encourage the union to accept their proposal for a change to the holiday pay policy by offering extra money to those officers who worked on a holiday.

Campbell argued during negotiations that the situation should remain status quo. He said the union didn’t want to lose ground on issues negotiated in years past, adding that the choice provided to officers was good for morale.

The arbitrator wrote in his decision that he believes both sides benefit most from the city’s plan regarding holiday pay.

“Specifically, the city’s proposed procedures create a desirable incentive for police officers to actually use holiday time for its intended purpose of rest and recreation rather than as a means of monetary pay off,” he wrote. “The benefit to the city comes from improved budgetary and staffing manageability. These are reciprocal benefits in the final analysis.”

The arbitrator also decided that the term of the contract should be three years as opposed to the two years advocated by the union.

“The hard negotiations which led to the 2006 impasse and the instant arbitration placed considerable strain on the time, energy and resources of the parties,” he wrote. “Sufficient time to settle into the new labor agreement, to test its new provisions against the expectations of those affected, can best be gained by a three year rather than the all-too-brief two year agreement — particularly when the first year of the new agreement is already well under way.”

Payne said city officials will begin calculating backpay owed to the police officers immediately.

“The sooner we get that done, the better,” he said.

City Manager Tim Burton said both sides worked hard to reach an agreement, and when that wasn’t possible, arbitration proved to be an effective tool.

He added that this marks the first time under legislation passed in 2005 that the city has been involved with binding arbitration with the Helena Police Department.

 

Public safety officers to get boost in pay
Corrections employees also will see raises in new plan
From The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, October 10, 2006

 

Gwinnett police, fire department and sheriff's employees will get an average 12.4 percent pay hike overall under a new salary plan.

 

The pay raises will go into effect next January, County Administrator Jock Connell said Monday.

 

As part of the new plan, sworn correction employees also will get a raise, an average increase of 9.7 percent. Other employees, including dispatchers and other administrative employees, will receive an average 6 percent raise.

 

County leaders said they created the new pay structure after studying the salaries of officers in Atlanta, Cobb, DeKalb and Fulton counties. Commissioners said the increases were necessary to stay competitive with surrounding counties.

 

"Board members have said time and time again that this [public safety] must be at the top of our priorities, and maintaining a market-competitive pay structure plays a major role in being able to meet that goal," Connell said in a statement.

 

The salary plan, part of the county's proposed 2007 budget, will cost $12.1 million, county officials said.

 

Jim Fouchia, president of the Gwinnett police union, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, said he was pleased with the proposed pay raises.

 

"We are excited and very thankful to the commissioners for this," Fouchia said. "This will make our department competitive with any department in metro Atlanta."

 

Under the new plan, police officer salaries will be placed on a 12-step pay grade, said Susan Lee, the county's human resources director. In January, all sworn officers will be placed on that new salary structure. Officers' pay will be rounded up to whatever step on the new salary structure they are closest to, Lee said. Along with that pay increase, officers also will receive a 5.5 percent "cost of living" raise in July, Lee said.

 

Officers with satisfactory work will move up a step on the new pay scale by getting a 4 percent raise every year, Lee said.

 

This is the second year county officials have addressed law enforcement pay.

 

In 2005, county officials gave rookie officers a 16 percent pay hike to make Gwinnett's new officers among the highest paid in the area. Entry-level pay jumped by more than $4,600, to $33,197. New hires also got a $2,000 cash bonus during their first year on the job. Sheriff's deputy rookies got a 10 percent raise and new firefighters got a 6 percent hike.

 

County officials said that although the total cost of next year's proposed pay increase plan is significant, it is needed.

 

"The Board of Commissioners is deeply committed to hiring — and keeping — the best and the brightest men and women to protect and serve the public," Commission Chairman Charles Bannister said.

 

 

City dealings with unions under way

Contract negotiations secret, but not for long

From the Argus Leader, October 9, 2006

 

They're called ground rules.

And rule number one is, keep your mouth shut about what's happening.

Such is the atmosphere surrounding contract negotiations between the city of Sioux Falls and the three labor unions representing city employees. All three of the union contracts expire at the end of this year.

Taxpayers, of course, have a vested interest in what happens. After all, they pay the tab.

The majority of the city's 1,070 employees are represented by one of the three unions. Teams representing the city are in various stages of negotiations with their counterparts at the unions.

The city's elected officials, meanwhile, have been keeping abreast of those negotiations through briefings in executive sessions - meetings that are closed to the public.

Both sides in the negotiations agree on ground rules, which dictate the process' decorum.

So what's happening in those negotiation rooms?

"In the ground rules, I can't talk to you guys at all." So said Loren McManus to a couple of reporters last week. McManus is one of the negotiators for the Fraternal Order of Police, and - as the department's spokesman - he's normally chatty with reporters.

But not about union contracts.

All he would say is that they are in negotiations and that the membership hasn't ratified a contract.

That's as far as Sioux Falls Fire Rescue Capt. Jeff Winters would go. Winters is a negotiator for the local chapter of the International Association of Fire Fighters. He hinted that a terrible fate awaits those who break the ground rules.

"I will not break the ground rules because I will get in big trouble if I do," he said.

They might be secret now, but ultimately, the products that emerge from those negotiations will be public. Once union members ratify their contracts, the City Council will vote to adopt them in a public meeting.

Jennifer Holsen, the city's human resources director and a member of the city's negotiating team, said the negotiations are a "lengthy process" because "we're dealing with issues that involve their wages, hours and conditions of employment."

"They're important issues to the city, and they're important issues to the employees," said Holsen, who has been involved in collective bargaining negotiations for the city since 1986.

The contracts are typically good for three or four years, Holsen said.

"There are a lot of issues that can come up in those three or four years," she said.

Mayor Dave Munson said last week that he is working with the city's negotiators to reach deals that are amenable to both the unions and its employer.

The process, he said, involves some give and take.

"We listen to what they have to say, and we tell them what we can do," Munson said.

 

 

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS

 

POLICEPAY provides complete contract negotiations for your bargaining unit.  We will:

 

  • Do all of the research work – wage survey, costing analysis, financial ability-to-pay
  • Train your executive board how to lobby and politic (at your place)
  • Meet with the key decision makers in your city – Chief, Mayor, Administrator
  • Provide all preparation for contract negotiations
  • Serve as your lead negotiator

 

Our fee will be a fixed amount that is agreed to up front.  The fee will include all costs, even travel and hotels.  There will be no surprises.  We offer options with no up front payment.  You can make equal monthly payments.  If your contract is 36 months, you will make 36 monthly payments.

 

During the term of the contract, we will:

 

  • Update your wage survey whenever there is a change
  • Update ability-to-pay reports annually
  • Provide monthly reports on major revenue (if data is available)
  • Meet with you annually to review strategies

 

If we are not able to reach an agreement with your city, we will provide arbitration services at no additional cost.  We intend to get an agreement.

 

Our approach to contract negotiations is different than what you are probably used to.  We engage in non-confrontational negotiations that rely on developing relationships.  However, we do not use so called “win-win” negotiation.  It’s a loser for you.  There will be no unfair labor practice complaints filed by us or lawsuits and grievances.  If that is what you are wanting you need to call the usual knucklehead lawyers that have been screwing up police negotiations for years.  Intimidation and blustering are not in our arsenal.

 

If you prefer to negotiate yourself we can provide any of the services listed above, with the same payment plans, only at lower rate.  If this is the way you want to go, you need to attend one of our negotiation seminars.  The upcoming seminars are listed on our website.

 

For more information, give us a call at (405) 234-2235, or contact Matt Barnard on his cell phone at (405) 413-6517. You may also email Matt at matt@policepay.net.

 

 

POLICEPAY.NET

 

Your Ultimate Solution For Contract Negotiations

 

www.policepay.net

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net