The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, September 7, 2006

www.policepayjournal.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

POLICEPAY.NET NEGOTIATION TRAINING

                        

                        OCTOBER 11-12            WASHINGTON D.C.

                        NOVEMBER 9-10     -      LAS VEGAS          (click on link for information)

 

LONG BEACH, CA

Council delays talk on police retention

TULSA, OK

Vote may decide police pay

FREMONT, CA

Council may end up with cops' contract

INDIANA

Increasing trooper pay saps towns

MADISON, CT

Town, Police Agree to New Contract

BELLEAIR BEACH, FL

Town, Police Agree to New Contract

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

Council delays talk on police retention
Members want more time to weigh proposal on pay raise.

From The Press Telegram, September 6, 2006

 

LONG BEACH - A discussion on the city's efforts to retain a growing number of veteran police officers looking for work elsewhere was postponed Tuesday night.

 

Citing a number of questions raised by the council following a closed-door meeting, City Manager Jerry Miller announced the cancellation of the item during the 7 p.m. budget session.

 

During the closed meeting, the council was given an update by city staff on a proposal to increase police pay by 4 percent over the next three years.

 

"To be fair to the council, this is the first discussion, their first chance to hear details," on the proposal, he said.

 

The proposal, unveiled last week during a series of Long Beach Police Officers Association meetings, would also stagger additional pay bumps for veteran officers.

 

Most officers said dragging out the increases was unfair and that they did not believe the city's claims that it is the only affordable option.

 

Union President Steve James has been working for the past several weeks with city leaders to come up with a plan to reduce a growing number of resignations among veteran officers. In the past year, more than two dozen officers have left for better paying positions.

 

Miller's announcement Tuesday night was greeted with grumbling in the audience. A number of people said they planned to talk about the issue; more than a dozen people - including several members of the Long Beach Police Department brass - walked out of the council chambers as soon as Miller said the item had been removed.

 

Miller said he would like to see the discussion included in next week's council meeting and hoped the council would be ready to discuss the matter once again in a closed session the following week.

 

"We plan to do that, Mr. Miller," said Mayor Bob Foster.

 

Library, fire requests

 

As supporters held up posters that read, "Save Our Libraries," the head of Library Services at Tuesday's budget workshop presented the City Council with the department's needs for the next fiscal year.

 

Director Eleanore Schmidt echoed Foster's proposal to restore library services to their pre-2004 levels, which requires an additional $2 million.

 

About $1.3 million of the money would help pay for extended hours and after school programs. The rest would be a one-time allocation of $400,000 for materials and $300,000 for the MacArthur Park Library.

 

The council must vote on the final budget by the end of the month. The 2007 fiscal year begins Oct. 1.

 

Library Clerk Charlotte Blaire and six other library staff members and volunteers, including children and teenagers, listened to Schmidt.

 

"It's shameful that the (main) library is closed Sunday and Monday," Blaire said. Schmidt said libraries help reduce illiteracy and crime rates while providing a safe haven for children in poor neighborhoods.

 

In other council business, five fire stations need to be rebuilt to the tune of at least $6 million to $8 million per station, Fire Chief Dave Ellis reported.

 

Stations 7, 9, 10 and 12 would need to move out of their residential neighborhoods to a major street to facilitate faster response times, Ellis said. The Marine Safety Beach Operations would cost at least $8 million to $9 million to rebuild.

 

Ellis said these stations, built between 1936 and 1967, are old and in poor condition, and some are too small to accommodate modern equipment. Many do not have separate shower facilities for female firefighters, he said.

 

"The needs that we have are critical," said Rich Brandt, president of the Long Beach Firefighters, Local 372.

 

Councilman Val Lerch said he understood the Fire Department's needs.

 

"Chief, I support you 100 percent," Lerch said to Ellis. "We need to get out there and make the stations modern."

 

 

 

Vote may decide police pay
Mayor first to use election option to decide raise

From the Tulsa World, September 1, 2006

 

For the first time in Tulsa's history, a request for an election has been made to decide the amount of a Police Department pay raise.

 

Mayor Kathy Taylor filed the election request with the City Clerk's Office late Wednesday afternoon to meet a deadline set by state law.

 

On Aug. 21, a neutral arbitrator awarded an 8-percent across-the-board raise to be effective Jan. 1, which was the best offer submitted by the Fraternal Order of Police during unsuccessful negotiations with the city. The city offered a 4.5 percent raise.

 

By law, Taylor had two options: accept the arbitrator's award or ask for an election and let the voters decide between the two options.

 

"I filed the request for the election to preserve our options so we can continue a dialogue and make a fiscally responsible decision on behalf of all the employees of the city," Taylor said after a special Thursday afternoon meeting of the City Council.

 

During a 90-minute closed executive session at the meeting, Taylor discussed with city councilors the arbitration award and her request for an election.

 

More than 50 police officers waited outside the executive session to see whether action would be taken by the council. Councilors did not discuss the issue in an open meeting.

 

"We're disappointed that we haven't been granted the award yet," said Darin Filak, president of the Fraternal Order of Police. "A neutral arbitrator looked at all the facts and said that we deserve the raise and the city can afford it."

 

Filak said this is the second time the city and the FOP have resorted to arbitration on their contract and the first time an election has been requested since the state enacted an election option in the late 1990s.

 

"We're willing and ready to take the issue to a vote of the people," he said. "We feel confident that the citizens of Tulsa will come out and support us.

 

"Ultimately, that may be the best outcome for this problem: Let the citizens decide what comes next."

 

While Filak said the FOP is willing to discuss options, he said it would be "a difficult pill for our membership to swallow if we try to settle for something less than 8 percent unless there is compensation in benefits or something."

 

"The ball is in her court to make an offer or propose a solution," he said of the mayor.

"We've proved our side."

 

City officials say that accepting the award would add $940,000 to the current budget, which runs from July 1 to June 30.

 

Budget Director Pat Connelly said the raise would greatly affect next year's budget, when the 8 percent would be for the entire year. "The money just isn't there," he said.

The city still has outstanding contracts with the Tulsa Firefighters Local 176 and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 1180, which represents about 880 labor, trade and emergency communications employees.

 

Now that the mayor has filed a request for an election with the City Clerk's Office, she has 10 days to call a special election. Once ballot language is agreed upon by the two parties or an arbitration panel, the wording will be sent with an election request to the Election Board, and an election date will be set.

 

City Attorney Alan Jackere said the city and the FOP can reach a contract agreement up until the day of the election.

 

 

Council may end up with cops' contract
Union talks stalled when Fremont lowered its proposed cost-of-living adjustment

From the Argus, September 3, 2006

 

FREMONT — City Council may soon have to impose contract terms on Fremont police and city staff after a lengthy bargaining session with a state mediator last week failed to yield an agreement.

 

Kathy Ito, Fremont's labor relations officer, said she is open to having more mediation meetings before the situation reaches that point.

 

But Fremont Police Association attorneys instead will be sending the City Council a letter Tuesday requesting a public hearing to help break the stalemate, said Glenn Miller, police union president.

 

"We told (city staff), 'OK, this failed. Now we have no choice,'" Miller said. "There was a mediation, but no negotiation. (City negotiators) have said this is what you're getting — take it or leave it."

 

Talks had stalled in July when the city lowered its original offer of a 2.9percent increase in cost-of-living adjustments to 2.5 percent, Miller said. The police officers' seven-year contract expired June 30.

 

The meeting with the state mediator, held from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. Wednesday, also hit a snag when city staff rejected the mediator's recommendation to increase the uniform allowance by $500 per year for the department's roughly 175 officers, Miller said.

 

Ito declined to give details on the contract talks, citing the mediator's recommendation to keep the negotiations private. Still, she added: "Both sides worked really hard to come to a deal. I would say we got closer."

 

Asking City Council to unilaterally impose police contract terms would be unprecedented in Fremont, said Mayor Bob Wasserman, a former Fremont police chief.

 

It also may present a dicey situation for council members. On one hand, they may be hard-pressed to decide against city staff and call for more expenditures while officials for months have been citing budget woes.

 

On the other, the council risks angering officers already understaffed while patrolling a city covering 92 square miles.

 

One thing city staff and the police union agree upon is that the Fremont Police Department is one of the lowest-staffed police agencies in the Bay Area, which has resulted in slower response times by officers, Miller said.

 

According to one survey, the city has slid from being the nation's 23rd-safest city of its size to its current ranking of 59th.

 

"The average citizen does not understand how unsafe Fremont is," he said. "Most people have a different perception, but this is not a safe city."

 

Miller said that he expects the City Council to impose the city staff's terms, and he argues that the decision would hurt the department's ability to recruit and retain officers in the near future.

 

"We have 15 people set to retire. So, there will be a mass retirement by them to avoid the terms of the contract." he said.

 

"It's a pretty depressing time right now in the police department."

 

 

Increasing trooper pay saps towns

Higher salaries lure away officers

From The Journal Gazette, September 4, 2006

 

An announcement in April that Indiana State Police trooper pay would rise 20 percent wasn’t good news for everyone.

 

Smaller departments are feeling the pinch, as their officers are drawn to larger agencies that push for lateral transfers – moves from one police agency to another – and offer higher pay.

 

At the Kendallville Police Department, eight officers on the 18-member force have applied for employment this year with the Indiana State Police or the Fort Wayne Police Department, another common destination for officers seeking to move to a bigger agency.

 

“We have our work cut out for us,” Chief Robyn Wiley said. “We’re certainly in the midst of dealing with it.”

 

One Kendallville officer has already been accepted by the Indiana State Police, and two are undergoing the hiring process with Fort Wayne, Wiley said.

 

The Indiana State Police announced in July that it had its largest recruitment class in its 73-year history. The agency plans to choose 160 recruits from 3,375 applicants.

 

In part, Gov. Mitch Daniels attributed the steep rise – up from 474 applicants the year before – to the salary increases he approved in April. First-year trooper salaries rose from $32,760 to $39,312 annually.

 

The state police’s first-ever lateral transfer class of about 30 officers began last week, said 1st Sgt. Brian Olehy, assistant commander of the state police’s public information office.

 

The state police also dropped some of its earlier requirements, such as trooper applicants must have at least 60 college-level credit hours or the equivalent military or law enforcement experience.

 

The measures are necessary to help the state police stay competitive, Olehy said. Indiana State Police officers are recruited as well, often by federal agencies.

 

“We’re all competing for the same pool of applicants,” he said.

 

The Fort Wayne Police Department, which pays patrol officers an average base salary of $45,000, requires that lateral transfers have at least two years of law enforcement experience and currently be working at another law enforcement agency, spokeswoman Robin Thompson said.

 

Hiring lateral transfers offers several advantages, Thompson said. The officers save on the cost of training, and they can fill in gaps when the department’s needs aren’t enough to require putting a large class through the police training academy.

 

“They can be plugged in a lot sooner, too,” she said.

 

Wiley, a former longtime state police investigator himself, said he doesn’t begrudge other departments for using lateral recruitment tactics, nor his officers for pursuing opportunities with the larger agencies.

 

The obvious problem, as usual, is money.

 

The 2006 PolicePay Index ranked Fort Wayne Police Department salaries in the top 20 out of the largest 200 American cities when cost of living in factored in. Fort Wayne officers are paid slightly below the national average, but their wages are 17 percent higher than average because of the area’s low cost of living, the report said.

 

The Kendallville City Council recently approved a 2 percent raise for 2007, bringing officer pay to $35,346.

 

Kendallville Mayor Suzanne Handshoe had proposed a 5 percent increase to get the officers’ pay in line with some surrounding cities. But the police department already has the largest budget of all city departments this year at just over $1.9 million, and the proposal was defeated.

 

“It doesn’t help morale when the officers’ pay is behind,” Wiley said.

 

But Wiley worries about losing even a single officer, because the 18-member department already is strained. While Kendallville has grown 23 percent in the past 10 years, the size of its police force has remained the same, the chief said.

 

Auburn Chief Martin McCoy recognizes Wiley’s plight, because in some ways, it mirrors his own.

 

“We seem to lose officers to Fort Wayne quite often,” he said.

 

Auburn’s force of 22 full-time officers has seen about one officer a year for the past five years transfer to Fort Wayne, and one is in the application process now, McCoy said.

 

McCoy said he is not aware that anyone in his department is currently seeking employment with the state police. Auburn’s patrol officers receive an annual salary of $38,026, keeping them nearly on the level with the state police.

 

The department also recently received approval to hire a 23rd officer, McCoy said.

While it might take awhile for smaller towns and cities to find money in their budgets to raise police pay, it isn’t necessarily a bad thing, Olehy said.

 

Whether it’s teachers, firefighters, police officers or anyone in public service, “You get what you pay for,” he said.

 

How to deal

 

Without the attraction of higher pay, Kendallville has been exploring ways to retain officers.

 

One idea would be to have officers sign contracts, similar to the state police’s five-year contract, or pay back training costs if they transfer out, but the agency is reluctant to put such requirements in place. They could be more of a deterrent to officers looking at employment with the department, Wiley said.

 

Contracts might ensure that the agency gets a few good years from its officers, he said.

 

Usually officers who have three to four years of experience are most apt to make lateral transfers. Unfortunately, that’s about how long it takes some officers to get the level of experience necessary to be a real asset to the department, Wiley said.

 

Despite the glaring problem of relatively low pay, it’s important to realize that other factors contribute to the problem, Wiley said.

 

A few officers who have transferred from Kendallville to Fort Wayne, for example, have been Fort Wayne natives seeking an opportunity to go home.

 

The officers may see more opportunities at the larger departments to try out new roles “I think a lot of it just has to do with what the person’s looking for,” he said.

Some officers find what they’re looking for in Kendallville and stick around. Job security at smaller departments is often better, and Kendallville has strong school systems, Wiley said.

 

With young officers feeling the pull to larger departments, Wiley tries to emphasize the benefits in smaller ones that don’t have anything to do with money. An officer at a smaller department often will get a wide variety of calls and get more experience dealing with different types of crimes, Wiley said.

 

Wabash County Sheriff Leroy Striker agrees that not all of it has to do with the appeal of larger departments.

 

In the four years of his term, he has not lost an officer to another department, but he has lost officers to other occupations that pay better, he said.

 

On a smaller scale, mid-size police departments attract their own lateral transfers from even smaller agencies, Striker said.

 

He recently hired an officer from the town of South Whitley.

 

Striker, like McCoy, attributes the retention rate in part to efforts to get officers’ pay in line with that of other departments.

 

Wabash County recently approved an increase for 2007 for deputies from about $30,000 to $33,000. Sergeants will see a $5,000 increase from $31,000 to $36,000, as will captains, from $31,500 to $36,500.

 

Majors’ pay will increase from $32,000 to $38,000, Striker said.

 

The new state police policies “absolutely puts us in a very interesting situation,” he said. “We’re going in the right direction.”

 

 

Town, Police Agree to New Contract

From the Shore Publishing, September 7, 2006

 

Madison - After years of unsuccessful attempts, charges, and countercharges and hearings before state boards of mediation and arbitration, the town and its police union have reached a long-term, precedent-setting contract. The contract runs for six years—from 2005 to 2012—twice the usual length. More important, it provides for dramatic changes in the pension, vacation, and health insurance coverage over the long-term. The changes affect all officers now within the department, with the exception of the police chief, the only department member who is not in the union.

 

The contract is retroactive to July 1, 2005. Officers will receive 3.25 percent wage increases for that year and then 3.25 percent increases in each of the following four years.

 

There is a provision for a wage re-opener after that. In a new provision, all department officers hired after Jan. 1, 2006, will not reach retirement eligibility until completion of 25 years of credited service. At present, police officers are eligible for retirement after 20 years, a benefit the union fought hard to obtain just a few years ago. This new provision and others established, in effect, a two-tiered retirement system.

 

The new contract also agrees that overtime earned shall not be included in the pension benefit calculations and payments for employees hired after Jan. 1 of this year. Police officers presently on the job and earning overtime have that overtime pay included as a portion of retirement benefits. For present officers, the employee contribution to retirement is increased to 7.5 percent, retroactive to July 1, 2005.

 

For officers hired after Jan. 1, 2006, the employee contribution to retirement will be 9 percent. For officers hired after Jan. 1, 2006, the town will not offer any form of retirement medical benefits nor contribute to the retirement medical benefit fund.

 

This is a major change. In the case of police officers presently in the department, the town will pay the full cost of retiree medical insurance for the retiree and his or her spouse. This is also a major change. Police have been seeking a retiree medical benefit for a spouse for several years.

 

The new contract also makes changes in overtime and compensatory time. It then makes major changes in vacation time, increasing the number of years of service needed before an officer can take three weeks and four weeks of vacation. There is then a provision that allows the town to "buy back" an officer's vacation time. In part, that paragraph reads, "On or before July 10 each year, the town may elect to require employees who have an annual vacation entitlement of at least 15 days to sell back up to five days at the wage rate of time and one-half. Employees may elect at their own option to sell back up to an additional five days at a rate of time and one-half if declared by Sept. 1."

 

The changes in the pension calculations, the retiree medical and spousal benefits, and the vacation time and buy-back are all significant and certainly not customary in police union contracts. Neither is the "two-tier" benefit system agreed to here. In effect, First Selectman Tom Scarpati said when explaining the new contract, "We have agreed to maintain retiree medical benefits and spousal benefits, which present a significant liability to the town, in exchange for a new two-tiered system and changes in the number of days worked.  The long-term financial benefit for the town is substantial." He said the two-tier system introduced with this contract "provides a sunset for these retirement benefits." Scarpati has long contended that increasing pension benefits and medical retiree benefits will create a rapidly spiraling liability for the town that would cost millions.

 

This contract, he said, prevents that. Scarpati has also spent more than a year publicly discussing what he has called "the lost time issue"—the number of days a police officer actually works. Changes in vacation time and compensatory time within this new contract will remedy the problem, he said. Scarpati complimented the police union. "We sat down at the negotiating table face to face and worked out these issues in good faith, without state mediators or arbitrators, and I want to thank the officers and the union for their cooperation."

 

 

Police, city are bound for mediation

The two sides in Belleair Beach will try to overcome their salary stalemate with a special magistrate.

From the St. Petersburg Times, September 6, 2006

 

BELLEAIR BEACH - Salary negotiations between the city and the police union came to a halt last week when the union declared a formal impasse, invoking a state law that requires an outside mediator to help the two sides reach agreement.

 

The impasse is the latest in a series of events underscoring the serious morale problem in the city's Police Department.

 

Sgt. Michael Coleman took over as interim police chief Tuesday, after the resignation of longtime Chief Ernest Armistead. After more than 20 years with the city, Armistead left to take a higher paying position with the Pinellas County Sheriff's Office.

 

Two city police officers recently resigned to take jobs with the Sheriff's Office, also citing higher pay.

 

Sheriff Jim Coats said the city's five remaining full-time officers also have applied to work in his office. More jobs may be available in October, he said.

 

Current Belleair Beach police salaries range from $28,825 to $42,084. By comparison, the Sheriff's Office pay range is $38,173 to $57,278.

 

In the past several weeks, a number of city police officers spoke at City Council meetings, arguing that if the city cannot afford to pay its officers more money, it should disband the department and contract with the sheriff.

 

Such an action would require a referendum election, as required by the city charter. Two previous attempts to disband the department were soundly defeated in recent years.

 

"Our citizens love their cops. The city should pay them," said Tim Ingold, president of Pinellas Lodge 43 of the Fraternal Order of Police, the union that represents Belleair Beach police officers.

 

The city has been unwilling to offer enough money to keep its officers, he said.

City Manager Reid Silverboard countered that the union is unwilling to negotiate a reasonable compromise.

 

Ingold sent a letter declaring an impasse to the city and the state Public Employees Relations Commission.

 

That action triggers state mediation rules, which call for the city and the police union to mutually pick from a list of "special magistrates." The mediator would meet with both parties, review the past negotiations and then recommend an agreement.

 

The magistrate's recommendation is not binding, but if the city and police do not accept it, the City Council would then make the final decision in an open meeting.

The city's decision would set police salary levels for the rest of the fiscal year, and new salary negotiations would likely begin immediately, Silverboard said.

 

"I don't think anyone is pleased with this situation," he said, acknowledging that the city's police offers are not happy. But he stressed that the city and the union have agreed on "all issues" except salary.

 

The union is asking for an $8,600 across-the-board salary hike the first year, as well as 5 percent salary increases in the second and third years of the pending contract. There also would be 3.5 percent step increases according to grade and length of service, Silverboard said.

 

When the city offered a flat $5,000 salary hike for all officers, the union at one point lowered its salary demand to $6,500 but then returned to its initial $8,600 request, he said.

 

"They indicated they would not accept anything else," Silverboard said. "The city was willing to continue negotiations, but the union declared an impasse."

 

Until the dispute is resolved, the city's police officers will be paid under the existing contract, which formally expires Sept. 30.

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ă POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net