The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, August 2, 2007

JOIN THE POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List 

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 701-8616  

The Police Negotiator's Handbook
Power, Influence, & Persuasion
How to Get It. How to Use It.
by Ronald J. York
CLICK HERE FOR INFORMATION

POLICEPAY.NET

THE POLICE NEGOTIATOR’S HANDBOOK

STAMFORD, CT

Proposals for police contract go to arbiter

JEFFERSON CO, TX

County denies deputies raise request

MONTEBELLO, CA

Police negotiations hit roadblock

SAN BRUNO, CA

City reaches contract deal with police

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

POLICEPAY.NET SERVICES

(Click on service name for information and pricing)

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS  NEGOTIATIONS RESEARCH

 

The Police Negotiator's Handbook,

by Ron York, POLICEPAY.NET president

The book that every Negotiator needs

is now available.

This book is presented in the six stages of Negotiations.

Stage One – Research Evidence

Stage Two – Develop Argument

Stage Three – Create Key Relationships

Stage Four – Generate Public Support

Stage Five – Plan Strategy

Stage Six – Negotiate Deal

 

Negotiations are about persuasion.

If you want a handbook that is brief and to the point,

Click here to order

 

Proposals for police contract go to arbiter

From the Advocate, July 30, 2007

STAMFORD - After two years of failed negotiations, the new police contract is due by October after the two sides submitted their final proposals last week to an arbiter, officials said.

The arbiter's decision could sway the city budget by more than $10 million, officials have said. The two sides agreed on more than three dozen minor issues but got stuck on the three biggest: wages, health benefits and the pension plan.

"We are down to the big ones," said Officer Michael Merenda, president of the police union.

The union is fighting a city proposal that would require officers to meet weight and fitness standards, officials said.

The police union has been without a contract since June 2005. More than money is at stake; as many as two dozen officers may retire if benefits do not improve in the new contract, a scenario that would leave the department with a critical shortage of officers.

Last year, Merenda accused the city of increasing health-care costs for officers while cutting wage hikes and refusing to budge on pension payouts.

The city countered by saying it offered the union the same 3 percent wage increase offered to other city unions. Officials said the higher health-care costs would bring officers in line with what members of other unions pay for insurance.

The biggest sticking point has been the police union's request for a cost-of-living increase in the pension plan. The union has said retirees cannot afford to live in Fairfield County as housing prices rise.

"I have retirees struggling out there," Merenda said last year.

He declined to comment for this story.

The city's labor negotiators refused to enhance pensions for any union, said Dennis Murphy, the head labor negotiator, and Nancy Markey, the assistant director of human resources.

The police union dropped its request for a deferred retirement plan, Markey said.

The $150 million police pension fund, made up of contributions from active officers, has enough money to cover pension payouts without help from the city, Merenda has said.

But the margin is thin and declining, a recent audit found.

Merenda would not reveal his final wage proposal. Last year, the union asked for a 7 percent annual wage hike for officers and sergeants. Those ranks make up about 80 percent of the department.

Murphy said that proposal was too costly. Every other city union but the custodians received 3 percent wage hikes in contracts negotiated last year and in 2005, Murphy and Markey said.

Merenda said last year the 7 percent request was fair, given the city's refusal to move on the pension issue and their plan to increase health-care payments.

"You can't just take the salaries out or the pension out and analyze a contract issue by issue," Merenda said last year. "You have to look at the whole picture."

Murphy said police salaries are in line with other departments in the state.

Rookie officers in Stamford earn $47,042 per year; officers on the top salary step - those with at least six years on the job - earn $59,098 in base salary.

The range is similar in other towns, a review of other contracts shows, though officers in several county departments earn more. Greenwich patrol officers earn $50,000 to $63,000 per year; the gap widens in Westport, where rookies make about $43,000 and top-step officers earn more than $63,000. Patrol officers in Ridgefield can earn up to $67,000 in base salary.

But officers in Bridgeport, Newtown and Waterbury max out at $51,000 to $55,000.

Stamford officers deserve more than a 3 percent raise because the crime rate and cost of living here are higher than in several of those communities, Merenda has said.

Traditionally, police pay the least among public employees for health care, city officials have said. Under the current contract, single officers pay $4 per week, officers with one dependent pay $8 and officers pay $10 for the family rate.

Other city employees pay 5 percent to 10 percent of the amount they would have to pay if they quit their city jobs, records show. A single person without dependents who quit and lost health coverage would have to pay about $7,000 per year to keep health insurance, officials said.

That amounts to about $13.50 per week, much more than a single officer now pays.

Officers with families would have pay about $1,000 more for health insurance each year under that system.

It is unclear what the two sides proposed for health-care costs.

The proposals were sent to an arbiter from the state Department of Labor on Thursday, officials on both sides said. The two sides will submit briefs in support of their proposals over the next few weeks. The contract likely will be final by late September or early October.

 

County denies deputies raise request

From The Port Arthur News, July 30, 2007

 

BEAUMONT — William Eichelberger was “absolutely shocked” Monday by the Jefferson County Commissioners Court’s decision to deny a pay raise request for deputy sheriffs and corrections officers.

The president of the Jefferson County Association of Deputy Sheriff’s said it was the first time in history that he could remember the commissioners denying a proposal brought to them by their own committee.

“Their committee offered us an 18 percent increase,” Eichelberger said. “Some of our employees pay is 20 to 30 percent behind other agencies, but 18 percent is a good place to start. I always thought you were supposed to bargain in good faith.”

Prior to taking the vote on the raise increase, Eichelberger asked the commissioners to consider offering more competitive pay for officers to keep deputies from leaving the department for local police positions.

“Our deputy sheriffs need a pay raise,” Precinct 2 Commissioner Mark Domingue told Eichelberger and his peers. “I want to support our deputies, but I cannot support an 18 percent raise.”

Domingue said he did not feel like the committee considered the pay averages at the five police departments located inside the county before making an appropriate recommendation.

According to Eichelberger, however, lumping in all of the local police department averages is unfair to deputies.

“We do not lose deputies to the smaller departments,” he said. “We train deputies and then they leave and go to either the Port Arthur Police Department or the Beaumont Police Department for better pay.”

He added that like PAPD and BPD, the sheriff’s department offers 9-step raises, while the smaller departments in the county offer 5-step raises.

“We just want to make it more competitive to keep good officers,” he said. “These are the people who provide security for Jefferson County residents and their families.”
Supporting Domingue’s no vote were Commissioners Eddie Arnold and Waymon Hallmark.

Both Precinct 4 Commissioner “Bo” Alfred and County Judge Ron Walker supported the 18 percent raise proposal.

“This thing is like an illness,” Walker said. “If it goes untreated, it will only get worse. Even the 18 percent increase is not enough for these ladies and gentlemen who protect us day and night. It is still not competitive with Port Arthur and Beaumont.”

Commissioners approved a 5 percent pay raise for themselves last year after a public outcry over their initial 18 percent raise request, bringing their salaries up from $73,362 to $86,508.

The sheriff’s deputies must now bring a new raise proposal to the commissioners for approval.

 

 

Police negotiations hit roadblock

Montebello officers, city spar over comparable pay raises

From the Whittier Daily News, August 2, 2007

 

MONTEBELLO - For the first time in its 60-year history, the Montebello Police Officers Association is working without a contract, the union's president said Wednesday.

 

While the association claims to be at an impasse with the city, Montebello officials said negotiations are ongoing and no impasse has been declared.

 

"We're in negotiations," said Randy Narramore, interim city administrator. "They have not officially declared an impasse with us."

 

Dan Weast, MPOA president, said the opposite.

 

"We're at an impasse," he said. "We're working outside of a contract. When we will go back to negotiating, I have no idea."

 

Attorney Richard Kreisler, hired to negotiate with the union, said the 81-member association has not filed a written notice of impasse or asked to meet with the city administrator, steps required by the city to declare formal impasse. Because they are law enforcement, no strike is eminent.

 

"That the POA has rejected the last city offer is accurate," he said.

 

Since the last contract expired in December 2006, the city and the association have failed to reach an agreement, Weast said.

 

"We were looking to get our medical benefits increased, and our salary increased to be comparable to other (cities' departments)," he said.

 

Weast said the city offered the officers a $5,000 "retention incentive" - a one-time payment for 2007 - and a chance to go back to negotiating the next year, terms the MPOA rejected.

 

Narramore declined to discuss details of the negotiation process because "we're still bargaining with them. The rules are, we keep negotiations private," he said.

 

Weast said Montebello police officers want to be paid comparably with other cities.

"Going another year without a salary increase puts us that much more behind," he said.

 

"We're going to pursue getting a good contract," added Michael Bergman, MPOA board member.

 

Kreisler said the city's offer took "good steps" in offering the $5,000.

 

"The city has offered to spend over $400,000 in the 2007-2008 fiscal year," he said.

 

"That's equivalent to about a 7.5 percent pay raise (for the officers)."

 

He said the city made a good-faith proposal, despite having serious financial issues.

 

"The POA should be focused on the overall financial situation in the city," he said.

 

"Every time you give a pay raise to a group as large as the POA, there is a dramatic impact on the city."

 

MPOA members said the current salaries could negatively affect the quality of the department.

 

If salaries are not competitive with neighboring police departments, Bergman said, Montebello will only attract lower-caliber candidates.

 

"Over a period of several years, if your salary will only attract the lower end, it will reflect on an organization's ability to serve people," he said.

 

Bill Molinari, Montebello City Councilman, concurred that negotiations are ongoing. He said the matter is still under closed session.

 

"The council is precluded from discussing closed-session matters until they're concluded," he said. "Once we resolve the issue we'll be happy to comment on it."

 

Narramore was mad the MPOA had gone to the press and said that while the association declared an impasse two weeks ago, it had since come back to the table.

"I want to keep it very professional," he said

 

 

City reaches contract deal with police

From the San Mateo Daily Journal, August 2, 2007

 

More than a year after the San Bruno police contract lapsed and negotiations began, a tentative contract agreement was reached with the city.

 

Details of the new contract will be released late next week but is a welcome step forward for the two sides. Negotiations began in May 2006. Since then, issues over salary and medical benefits were not resolved. The police department decided to bring in mediation on Oct. 11. The City Council will vote on the proposed contract on Tuesday, Aug. 14.

 

“It’s always a positive thing when a labor group reaches a contract agreement,” said Lt. Noreen Hanlon. “It’s always a morale boost.”

 

The two sides made the agreement on July 18. The police association had until Friday, July 27 to vote on the agreement, which was approved.

 

City Manager Connie Jackson confirmed the contract is going to the City Council but said she could not release details.

 

The proposal is very similar to the updated agreement with the public safety and mid-management group, said Human Resources Director Tami Yuki.

 

That proposal included a three-year contract from July 2006 through June 30, 2009; a lump sum agreement instead of retroactive pay; and about 24 percent increase in salary over the term of the contract, said Yuki.

 

Reaching the agreement wasn’t as difficult as getting to the table, said Mayor Larry Franzella. It was resolved quickly once both groups were able to meet, he said.

 

This means the city only has one group without an updated contract — the management group.

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2007 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

219 West Boyd St, Suite 205

Norman, OK 73069

(405) 701-8616

www.policepay.net