The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, July 6, 2006

www.policepayjournal.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

 

 

LOS ANGELES, CA

Council approves pay hike of 10.25% for LAPD officers

SAN DIEGO, CA

No raises, cost of benefits leave some with little choice

BUFFALO, NY

Battle Between Buffalo Police, Control Board Going to Court

NEW YORK, NY

NYPD lieutenants, city reach pay deal

DULUTH, MN

Plan changes retiree insurance

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Council approves pay hike of 10.25% for LAPD officers

From The Los Angeles Daily News, July 4, 2006

 

The Los Angeles City Council has approved a contract with the LAPD's union giving officers increases totaling 10.25 percent over three years - an agreement that officials hope will serve as a benchmark for other municipal unions.

 

The package, which provides for increases of 3 percent the first year, followed by hikes of 3.5 percent and 3.75 percent, was approved by the council after more than 70 percent of the 9,200 police officers signed off on the contract.

 

Officials said the money for the raises was included in the city's budget. They hope the contract will be a model as officials negotiate other contracts, particularly with the United Firefighters of Los Angeles City.

 

"It's within the range we had hoped for," said Royce Minkus, who heads the employee relations section of the City Administrative Office. "But each union negotiates on their own."

 

The city has been at an impasse with the Engineers and Architects Association for more than a year. Last year, it approved a five-year contract that gives Department of Water and Power workers raises totaling 16.2 percent, but contains escalator clauses that could boost salaries by 31 percent.

 

 

No raises, cost of benefits leave some with little choice
From the UNION-TRIBUNE, July 5, 2006

 

When Gary Lawrence dropped off his application to become a police officer, he felt a calmness he hadn't expected in the two months he'd spent deliberating his future.

He knew he was doing the right thing.

 

The woman behind the counter stamped his paperwork and wished him luck, and that's when it became official:

 

Lawrence, a senior investigator with the San Diego Police Department, the lead detective in his unit, a 21-year veteran, was a candidate for a patrol job with the Chula Vista Police Department.

 

Lawrence hasn't worked patrol since becoming a detective 15 years ago, and the Chula Vista Police Department offers fewer opportunities than San Diego's, which is arguably the top law enforcement agency in the county.

 

But the money is better, even in an entry-level position in a department about an eighth the size of San Diego's, and the prospects are brighter for pay raises. If Lawrence gets the job – he expects to know by January – he figures he could work as a detective again in four or five years.

 

Like other officers in San Diego, Lawrence is shouldering the weight of the city's financial problems. He has gone without a pay raise for two years, while his payroll contributions for retirement and health care have been rising.

 

For Lawrence, who earns $78,000, it means his monthly take-home pay is $50 less than what it was two years ago. And he has been told not to expect a raise for at least three more years.

 

With two of his six children still at home and another in college, money is a constant concern for Lawrence and his wife, Blanca, who runs a small business from home.

 

“I feel that my 21 years of seniority should be good for something, but they're not,” Lawrence said after submitting his application last month. “At this point in my career, I want security, stability and hope. I feel like I am in limbo with San Diego PD, and I hate that feeling.”

 

The struggles facing Lawrence and his family shed light on a growing public safety problem in San Diego. Veteran police officers are fleeing, and city officials are trying to figure out how to keep them.

 

With staffing shortages presenting a variety of new problems, Mayor Jerry Sanders and Police Chief William Lansdowne are finalizing a recruitment and retention plan expected to be released this week.

 

The plan is long on recruitment and short on financing, meaning it won't stop officers such as Lawrence from leaving.

 

After taking a hard-line stance during contract negotiations, offering police nothing, Sanders is playing the loyalty card.

 

In a video e-mail sent to officers last week, Sanders makes no promises, but he says he hopes to offer pay and benefit increases as city finances return to healthy levels.

 

“I ask you to stick with the department that trained you . . . we need you to stay. We want you to stay,” he said.

 

Sanders has yet to reach out to other city employees.

 

“This group is the most affected, in terms of needing to hear from their mayor,” Sanders' spokesman Fred Sainz said. “This is the only employee group that we're having a recruitment and retention problem with.”

 

Although pay cuts get most of the blame, the vacancies also stem from high housing costs, rising gasoline prices (many officers commute long distances) and a robust job market for police.

 

Lawrence said he started to feel pinched when he could no longer pay the mortgage on his Mid-City home with one of his bi-weekly paychecks.

 

He and Blanca, both 42, canceled the family's annual summer vacation this year, and they stopped taking the kids out to eat on Friday nights.

 

“I'm mad at the city. I'm angry,” Blanca Lawrence said, noting that her husband “will have to prove himself all over again” if he's hired by Chula Vista.

 

“I also worry how Gary going back to shift work, and a different schedule, will affect our life,” she said. “But I feel like we don't have any security right now.”

 

In Chula Vista, police officers receive annual raises of 3 percent to 4 percent, which roughly covers the annual rate of inflation.

 

Lawrence's salary would dip to $73,000 as a patrolman in Chula Vista. But his take-home pay would increase by $5,000, because Chula Vista fully funds police pension and health care costs – benefits that cost Lawrence $10,000 a year in San Diego, according to his pay stubs.

 

At first, Lawrence felt abandoned, ashamed and angry when the city's financial troubles started digging into his paychecks.

 

Then he started taking action.

 

Before submitting his application in Chula Vista, Lawrence put together a spread sheet comparing pay and benefits.

 

He spent a night riding with Chula Vista officers. And when he learned he had to run 1.5 miles in 15 minutes to pass a physical to work in Chula Vista, he started getting up at 5 a.m. to walk. Eventually, he was jogging.

 

He changed his diet and lost 21 pounds.

 

He downloaded recordings of past City Council meetings to listen to what Sanders had to say about police compensation. He sought the advice of his city councilman.

 

“I love this place, but I don't want to worry about whether I'm gonna have to take another pay cut, or if I'm going to get even more cases,” Lawrence said recently from his desk in Northern Division.

 

Chief Lansdowne said the pending Public Safety and Strategy Plan the mayor is about to unveil includes a marketing strategy and a commitment to competitive salaries in the future.

 

“Eventually, there has to be competitive benefits and salaries,” Lansdowne said. “Otherwise, they'll continue to leave.”

 

Sanders was quoted late last year in The San Diego Union-Tribune saying that a four-year pay freeze for city employees was a reasonable expectation. Lawrence said articles quoting city officials discussing a pay freeze are frequently clipped and displayed on a bulletin board at Northern Division.

 

Lawrence said he has lost faith in Sanders, a former cop himself, and San Diego police chief from 1993 until 1999.

 

“He sounds like a robot to me,” Lawrence said. “He hasn't said anything that made me say, 'Oh, OK. I feel better now. I'll stick this out.' ”

 

Sanders is wrestling with a host of financial problems resulting from a pension deficit of $1.43 billion. The pension system is at the center of two federal investigations focused on decisions to underfund the system at a time when city officials were increasing retirement payments.

 

The mayor said his office is compiling a salary and benefit survey, research he hopes will spark discussions with the police union prior to next year's negotiations.

 

This year, the mayor and City Council rejected a police union proposal that sought $9.1 million in pay and benefit increases for fiscal 2007, which started Saturday.

 

The day after the impasse, Lawrence called Chula Vista's recruiter, who has heard from numerous San Diego officers.

 

Of the 10 veterans hired by the Chula Vista Police Department this year, six were from San Diego. Two more have accepted job offers, but have yet to pass medical and psychological evaluations, Chula Vista Capt. Gary Wedge said.

 

In his tenure as detective, Lawrence has worked vice, gangs, narcotics and sex registration. He's held his current position five years, primarily investigating robberies and assaults in Clairemont, University City, Bay Park and Carmel Valley.

 

His co-workers described him as modest, patient and diligent. His supervisors called him their best interviewer, a mentor and driven.

 

“Whenever we have something major, we give it to Gary,” said Sgt. Jerry Hara, to whom Lawrence directly reports. “He hangs onto cases and tries to solve them more than any other detective I've ever seen.”

 

Hara oversees four detectives. He said he needs at least two more.

 

“This is the worst I've ever seen it – morale and staffing,” Hara said.

 

In fiscal 2006, 71 officers left San Diego for jobs with other agencies. The previous year, it was 22.

 

Including retirements, the department is losing an average of 18 officers a month, a level not seen for at least the past three decades, Assistant Chief Bill Maheu said. In a normal month, the agency loses eight officers.

 

To meet minimum staffing levels, the department recently began calling in officers to work overtime. On a recent Sunday, 10 were called in, Maheu said.

 

The extra work and plummeting morale reportedly has affected just about everyone in the ranks, but some are too close to retirement to think about starting over.

 

Officer Jim Poole, a night-shift patrolman in Eastern Division, came to the department six years ago. At 52, he plans to retire in four years. Poole served in the Navy for 20 years, retiring as a commander.

 

With two pensions ahead of him and his children out of the house, Poole can wait out the hard times. “But if I were younger, and/or had kids, I would have already been gone,” he said.

 

Poole said he and his colleagues have been told things at lineup he never thought he would hear.

 

“We were told that the retention program consists of the chief going to the City Council and asking if we can work a second job What they're saying is, they can't afford to pay us a liveable wage, so here's your chance to spend even less time with your families.”

 

Family is what matters most to Lawrence, who took his wife with him when he drove to Chula Vista to drop off his application.

 

What took two months to decide took two minutes to execute.

 

“That wasn't very exciting,” he said when he got back in the car. “Aren't they supposed to set off fireworks, or at least firecrackers?”

 

Reality would set in soon enough.

 

“Although my decision to apply to CVPD after a 21-year career with SDPD is the most important decision in my professional life,” Lawrence said later, “I am just another hopeful job candidate.”

 

Battle Between Buffalo Police, Control Board Going to Court
From WIVB, July 3, 2006

 

The battle between Buffalo police and the city control board heads to court this week, with a possible police strike on the line. As Senior Correspondent Rich Newberg reports, the control board says it's well within its rights to keep the city's wage freeze intact.

 

The Buffalo control board has been granted extraordinary powers by the state, including the right to testify during arbitration, and the right to prohibit back pay to public employees after the wage freeze is lifted.

 

The board's executive director, Dorothy Johnson, expects the powers to prevail in the current dispute with the police union.

 

Johnson said, "The courts have upheld that the fiscal crisis is real, the wage freeze powers are legal in this particular instance."

 

The PBA board of directors, who met Monday, believes Buffalo police officers are no longer protected under the rules of collective bargaining, and will ask the courts this week for the right to consider a strike.

 

Rich Newberg: What if the courts rule in your favor?

 

Buffalo PBA president Bob Meegan: Sayonara! I think I'll leave that to the membership. They can make that determination if and when the time comes.

 

Johnson points out that Buffalo police did receive an initial $5,000-a-year wage boost, or an 8 percent hike, followed the next year by a 3.4 percent increase.

 

She says taxpayers would be ill-served by any police action.

 

Johnson said, "I think it would be a shame if they didn't have full police protection for the money taxpayers are paying."

 

The police union and the city are negotiating a new deal that could give officers a possible 10 percent increase in exchange for more concessions.

 

The rank-and-file meets later this week.

 

NYPD lieutenants, city reach pay deal

From The New York Daily News, July 4, 2006

 

The NYPD Lieutenants Benevolent Association reached a tentative agreement with the city that offers its members the same 17% over four years won by firefighters and detectives, sources said.

 

The agreement, to be presented to delegates tomorrow, would offer raises of 5%, 5%, 3% and 3.15% over the course of the retroactive four-year contract, which would end this month, sources said.

 

The tentative pact does not increase the length of time it takes to reach top pay, sources said. But the contract would defer some off days and start a pilot program in certain precincts for 12-hour tours.

 

Cops were awarded raises of 10.25% over two years last June for a contract covering 2002 to 2004.

 

However, an arbitration panel slashed the pay for recruits in the Police Academy from about $35,000 to $25,100 a year.

 

Plan changes retiree insurance

From The NEWS TRIBUNE, July 2, 2006

 

So what, exactly, is on the negotiating table as Mayor Herb Bergson's administration works to whittle Duluth's mounting retiree health-care liability by millions?

 

A glimpse into city contract talks shows that union members' money is.

 

As for police, they might take free city golf and skiing  as well as pay raises and free parking -- in exchange for paying more for health benefits.

 

The biggest change might be that the city no longer wants to guarantee retiree health insurance for people hired after 2006.

 

As it stands, city employees who have retired get better benefits than people still working. But that could be about to end, according to contract proposals acquired by the News Tribune between the city and three of its five employee bargaining units.

 

If the unions accept the city's basic framework, an estimated 1,200 city retirees for the first time could be responsible for paying insurance premiums.

 

They, along with all active employees, would be asked to pay 20 percent of almost $1,200 a month for families or $470 for single coverage in Blue Cross Blue Shield Plan 3.

 

Many retirees also face co-pays for the first time and deductibles of $250 per person.

 

Prescription drugs would cost from $7 to $20, according to Blue Cross and Blue Shield.

 

Many of the roughly 850 active employees already pay such out-of-pocket costs. "It's a public misconception to say that city employees get free health insurance," said Police union vice president Tom Maida.

 

Still, no single-coverage active employees currently pay premiums, said Gary Meier, city human resources director.

 

The city of Duluth's bargaining group is negotiating labor contracts with the city's five negotiating units: police, fire, supervisors, AFSMCE and a small group of executive and legislative employees. Most of the current agreements expire at the end of this year.

 

If negotiations stretch beyond that, it could mean catastrophe for the city, said the head of the City Council-appointed retiree health-care task force. The task force's 14 recommendations to solve the problem have been largely embraced by the mayor, City Council and unions.

 

Employee payments plus a universal plan could reduce the city's long-term liability by $54 million, Meier said.

 

Members of the police union say they're prepared to do their part to satisfy recommendations made by the task force. The report called for active employees and retirees to contribute $43 million in contract concessions toward the liability.

 

At the same time, it could be a boon to Duluth residents and city government facing the specter of a $300 million liability from the city's self-insurance fund by 2014. City leaders expect increases in utility rates and property taxes.

 

How big a burden falls on residents depends on how contract negotiations shake out, said former interim Chief Administrative Officer Julio Almanza.

 

MORE DETAILS

 

If the city's proposal is accepted, retirees hired after 2006 would no longer be eligible for city health insurance unless they paid for it themselves.

 

The city also proposes setting up retiree health-care savings accounts. Depending on the union, the city would contribute a lump sum of $12,000 toward the employee accounts, or up to $1,000 a year after retirement.

 

An immediate saving touted in the city proposals is that switching everyone to Plan 3 will immediately save the city nearly $600,000 a year. The savings come from being able to buy the contract at a bulk rate while reducing repetitive administrative costs.

Still, there are lots of "ifs" left in these negotiations, police union leaders said.

 

They characterized talks as preliminary; after two months the police union hasn't yet countered the city on health care. They remain more than $1 million apart on raises over the three-year contract. And the free parking would cost $98,000 a year.

 

As for free golf and skiing at city recreation areas, police union president Jon Haataja said his members asked for those concessions after their health club stipends were taken away last year to make up for training budget cuts. It would cost almost $100,000 to provide golf and ski passes for each officer and nearly $170,000 for them and their families.

 

THE LAYOFF ISSUE

 

Another contract proposal by the police union is a request to increase police staffing. Meanwhile, police union heads are willing to make contract concessions to keep the new recruits they have on the force, they said.

 

Last week Bergson said he planned to fire 25 to 30 probationary employees, including 11 new police officers, to save the city millions in future retiree health-care costs.

 

Bergson and police union heads met on Thursday, and Haataja said it appears that the layoff plan has worked its way onto the bargaining table. Whether that was the mayor's intent or not, it doesn't matter at this point, Haataja said.

 

A News Tribune reporter sat in on a bargaining session Friday between police and city staff.

 

At the meeting, police offered to put all probationary officers under contract terms for 2007 hires, which would ease Bergson's concerns.

 

Though Bergson gave the impression last week that the layoffs were about to occur, he appeared to back away from that position in an e-mail to the News Tribune Friday.

 

"There isn't a 'done deal,' " he wrote.

 

CURRENT RETIREES?

 

The city pays health-care costs for its retirees, except those who qualify for Medicare at age 65. They are responsible for those premiums.

 

But Bergson said retirees will soon be brought down to the same level of benefits that active employees get. The city has a legal opinion and state court precedent to back that move, Bergson said.

 

Current union leaders said they are not negotiating for retirees but understand they effectively could be.

 

Those benefits were hard-won in contract negotiations with the city over more than 20 years, said Ted Griak, past head of the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. Workers gave up pay raises and sick days in exchange for the paid family medical plans, he said.

 

Eli Miletich, the former police chief, said the workers have identified a court ruling in their favor.

 

It will be up to the retirees to challenge the city's position in a lawsuit, Bergson said.

 

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net