The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, May 24, 2007

JOIN THE POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List 

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 701-8616  

LAS VEGAS SEMINAR

POWER, INFLUENCE & PERSUASION

POLICE CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY       OCTOBER 25 & 26, 2007

CLICK HERE FOR INFORMATION

HAWAII

Police get 33.8% pay hike over 4 years

NEW YORK CITY

NYC Council Speaker Backs Pattern Bargaining

PHARR, TX

Mayor plans to block scheduled 2008 raises

VENICE, FL

Police union demands raises, car parity

STONY POINT, NY

Stony Point police reach contract deal

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

POLICEPAY.NET SERVICES

(Click on service name for information and pricing)

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS  NEGOTIATIONS RESEARCH

 

Police get 33.8% pay hike over 4 years

From the Honolulu Advertiser, May 24, 2007

 

An arbitrator awarded police officers in Hawaii across-the-board pay increases and differentials amounting to 33.8 percent in a four-year collective bargaining agreement signed Tuesday.

 

The State of Hawaii Organization of Police Officers, which represents 2,900 officers statewide, will announce details of the agreement at a news conference at 2 p.m. today at its office at 1717 Hoe St. in Kalihi Kai.

 

SHOPO president Tenari Maafala said union officials and representatives of Gov. Linda Lingle and the four county mayors met with arbitrator Russell Higa from May 8 to 11.

 

"This is long overdue for us," Maafala said of the pay increases awarded by Higa. "It closes the gap and will help address our concerns about recruitment and retention of officers in Hawai'i."

 

The agreement covers July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2011.

 

Under the new agreement, the starting pay of police officers will be increased from $38,000 to $43,000, not counting overtime, said Maafala. The highest base-salary level will be $76,000.

 

The agreement also includes a uniform allowance.

 

"Most officers have three sets and the price of one is between $125 and $150," Maafala said.

 

 

NYC Council Speaker Backs Pattern Bargaining

From WNBC, May 23, 2007

 

NEW YORK -- New York City Council Speaker Christine Quinn said she believes the problems with police pay can be worked out within the framework of pattern bargaining.

 

Appearing on Wednesday morning's "News Forum Now" on NewsChannel 4, Quinn agreed that the $25,100 first-year pay for rookie NYPD officers was a big problem and cited Police Commissioner Ray Kelly's recent testimony that the low salary has led to a severe shortage of police recruits and therefore a shrinking police force.

 

"I don't think the answer to that is an end to pattern bargaining," Quinn said. "I think the answer is for everybody to commit to get themselves back to the table and try to find a solution to a fair contract."

 

Pattern bargaining is the century-old process by which all the uniform services (e.g. Fire, Sanitation, Corrections, Police) essentially get the same overall deal in terms of total percentage pay increase, although the details of each contract are different.

 

On Monday, Kelly raised eyebrows at City Hall by saying that pattern bargaining wasn't working for the NYPD.

 

Mayor Michael Bloomberg disagreed when asked on Monday and Tuesday, his aides telling reporters that ending pattern bargaining would inevitably "break the bank."

 

Apparently, Quinn, who may very well be hoping to get the mayor's job in 2009, agrees.

 

 

Mayor plans to block scheduled 2008 raises

From The Monitor,  May19, 2007

 

PHARR — Last weekend’s vote to repeal collective bargaining rights for the city’s police and firefighter unions may also cancel future pay increases approved in both groups’ current contracts, Mayor Leo “Polo” Palacios said.

The mayor hopes to block raises scheduled for fiscal year 2008 but said the city’s peace officers are still likely to see some sort of bump in their paychecks

“We believe that the vote makes them null-and-void,” he said. “We’re going to give them annual increases, but the city manager will get to decide how much.

“It may be more, or it may be less,” he said.

Pharr residents voted May 12 to halt future contract negotiations between the unions and city representatives. But the measure appearing on city ballots made no mention of previous contracts, which include provisions for a $1,000 annual raise for Pharr’s police patrolmen and a $1,500 increase for firefighters starting in October. Combined, the raises are expected to cost the city nearly $200,000 over the next year.

Firefighter union President Matthew Garcia argues the vote to repeal collective bargaining rights should have no effect on contracts already approved by the City Commission.

“Our contract doesn’t expire until October 2008,” he said. “And since it was approved before this vote, it should remain in place.”

BACK TO COURT

This latest wrinkle in the collective bargaining debate has raised more questions about the May 12 ballot proposition, which has already been challenged in court.

Attorneys representing the unions challenged the legality of the ballot measure in March and said they plan to pursue that lawsuit even though the election has already occurred.

They cite a vaguely worded law that prohibits “like petition(s)” for or against collective bargaining within a year of a similar measure appearing on the ballot.

The city’s firefighters have bargained their contracts since 2002. Pharr voters approved collective bargaining for the city’s police officers during their elections last year.

Arguing that the law bars two collective bargaining measures from appearing on back-to-back ballots, union attorneys believe Pharr voters should not have been allowed to approve collective bargaining last year and then repeal it this month.

City attorneys, on the other hand, say the phrase applies to identical propositions. So the city’s push to approve negotiations one year and then repeal them the next was perfectly legal, Palacios said.

Despite hearing from both sides on March 22, state District Court Judge Noe Gonzalez has not ruled on their case.

Whether or not the mayor has the legal basis to block this year’s pay raises, his statements have increased tensions in an already strained relationship, Garcia said.

“We all know this mayor,” he said. “His life is politics. That’s what he lives and breathes”

But Palacios, content with his victory last weekend, says he looks forward to moving beyond this dispute.

“I want to show these people that it’s nothing against them,” he said, referring to the unions’ members. “I love them to death, but we need to take fiscal responsibility.”

 

Police union demands raises, car parity

From the Venice Gondolier, May 18, 2007

 

Representatives of the Venice police officers bargaining unit met May 10 with city negotiators in their second collective bargaining session.

 

The Fraternal Order of Police offered counter-proposals on 10 articles, including their rate of pay and other salary add-ons.

 

The two teams were able to reach tentative agreement on three of those articles, and came very near agreement on the language in some others, which still require a little more fine tuning of minor provisions.

 

The FOP's proposals regarding salary and other economic benefits for police officers, on the other hand, became the subject of considerable discussion, and will require further analysis and evaluation by the city administration before a response will be offered.

 

"Our reference point," said FOP Staff Representative Bill Hastings, "is the city's own pay study done by Evergreen Solutions. They recommended that employee pay be competitive with market averages in the area, so that is how we have arrived at our proposed figures."

 

'Show me the money'

 

The union is asking for wage increases of 7 percent across the board for each of the three years of the contract. In a negotiating session last month, the city had offered increases ranging from less than 1 percent to 5.3 percent for various steps in the pay plan, based on its interpretation of market comparables.

 

In response to the city's proposal to maintain top-out pay (the one-time annual amount given to officers who have reached the top step of their pay grade) at $1,200 per year, the union has proposed increasing it by an additional $100 in each of the last two years of the contract.

 

Then, after completing 15 years of service under the FOP proposal, officers would begin receiving an automatic 7-percent increase to their base pay rate instead of the top-out bonus payment.

 

In addition, the union is asking for a monthly "automobile benefit parity" payment of $300 for any police officer who does not have a take-home vehicle provided by the department. That would include nearly all of the officers.

 

'Parity'

 

Reviving one of the more controversial issues from negotiations three years ago, the union takes the position that most other area law enforcement agencies provide a take-home car for each officer. Understanding that the city is not interested in that concept for several reasons, union officials still feel that the value of the benefit being realized in other agencies should be added to the pay of Venice officers, establishing an economic "parity."

 

"If the city doesn't do something in this regard," said Hastings, "they will eventually pay the price, both as people begin to leave the organization to work elsewhere, and as applicants refuse to come here in favor of other employers."

 

The city's lead negotiator, Administrative Services Director Brenda Digges, responded by reminding the union of the uncertain economic situation now facing local governments in Florida.

 

"You are all aware," said Digges, "of the pending legislation in Tallahassee which threatens to substantially reduce our property tax revenues. The city has already eliminated 17 positions, and we are currently in the process of developing a scaled-down budget for the coming fiscal year."

 

"It's bad timing," she said. "It would be extremely difficult for the city to entertain a proposal of this magnitude under the circumstances. I just don't know where the money would come from."

 

The next negotiating session is scheduled for Wednesday, June 6, at 1:30 pm, at which time Digges assured the FOP that the city would have a comprehensive counter-proposal for its consideration, including a response to its economic demands.

 

Stony Point police reach contract deal

From THE JOURNAL NEWS, May 14, 2007

STONY POINT - The town and the Police Benevolent Association have reached an agreement on a two-year contract that gives members a 2 percent biannual increase and free health insurance for life.

 

According to the agreement, officers will be given a 2 percent salary increase every six months under the contract covering January 2006 to December 2007.

 

In addition, all members of the PBA, regardless of their appointment date, are entitled to have their medical and dental insurance fully paid by the town for life. The insurance includes dependent coverage, which will also be fully paid by the town for life.

 

The contract includes a $50 increase in all longevity steps.

 

The Town Board unanimously approved the contract at a meeting last week.

"Having been in my first negotiation I learned a lot," Supervisor Phil Marino said Friday.

 

"It was a hard work. I certainly had an idea what I would have liked to have for the town. I think the PBA had ideas of (what) they thought the best for its membership.

And we met somewhere in the middle," Marino said.

 

Sgt. Edward C. Schoales, president of the PBA, could not be reached for comment.

Residents such as Rita Ladoue were disappointed the town gave salary increases and new perks to police officers.

 

"That's absolutely ridiculous," said Ladoue, whose husband, Joseph, is a retired New York Police Department officer.

 

She said that compared to NYPD officers, she thought town officers were paid too much.

 

According to the current salary schedule before the increase, police officers' average base salary is more than $90,000.

 

Marino agreed Stony Point officers were well paid, but said they deserve the compensation because of the nature of their job.

 

"I sleep well. My daughter, my grandchildren and my son-in-law who live in town, we all sleep well because we have this excellently trained police department. Do they do dangerous jobs? Yes, they do. They do a difficult job," Marino said. "And Stony Point's salary was not out of line with the other salaries in the county."

 

Marino said the town did not go into binding arbitration because there's always a chance it could lose.

 

"It's better to compromise rather than someone else decides for you," he said.

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2007 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

219 West Boyd St, Suite 205

Norman, OK 73069

(405) 701-8616

www.policepay.net