The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, May 18, 2006

www.policepayjournal.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

< Training Class Schedule for 2006 >

June 28 – How To Lobby and Politic

June 29 – What You Should Do Before Negotiations

August 9 - How To Lobby and Politic

August 10 – What To Do At The Negotiating Table

September 20 - How To Lobby and Politic

September 21 – How To Conduct Your Own Interest Arbitration

Click here for more information and to register – Class size is limited to 30!

 

 

POLICEPAY.NET

DALLAS METRO TOTAL COMPENSATION SURVEY

MEMPHIS, TN

Council Rejects Police Raises

INDIANAPOLIS, IN

Officer Pay Raise Plan Stirs Controversy

JOLIET, IL

Police supervisors union stands pat

BOSTON, MA

3 Major Police Unions Press For More Officers

BARSTOW, CA

Big Boost In Barstow Police Pay

TUCSON, AZ

Spending Limit At $1.1B; More Police, Firefighters Sought

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

NEW DALLAS/FORT WORTH METRO WAGE SURVEY

 

POLICEPAY has just released a new wage survey for the eight largest cities in the Dallas/Fort Worth Metropolitan Area.  The survey uses the latest model developed by POLICEPAY.  The new model calculates the value of pension plans and retiree health insurance.  This is the most comprehensive model that we have ever used.  The Dallas/Fort Worth survey shows Plano to be the best paid department in the survey.  Arlington is at the bottom.  You can see the entire survey and documentation by clicking the link at the top of the POLICEPAY.NET homepage.  In addition, you can learn how you can obtain this same type of survey for your agency

 

Council rejects police raises

Pay freezes part of city belt-tightening
From the Commercial Appeal, May 17, 2006

 

The Memphis City Council rejected a proposed 1 percent pay raise for the city's 1,800-member Memphis Police Association in a session that stretched late into the night Tuesday.

 

The council's action, in a 7-5 vote, rejected a May 1 recommendation by a three-member council impasse committee to accept the union's final offer on wages.

 

With the council siding with the city administration's wage proposal, police officers covered by the union will get no pay raises over the next two years as the city tightens its belt. The raises for cops would have cost the city a total of about $1.5 million.

 

Mayor Willie Herenton has proposed freezing salaries for two years for all of the city's 22 unions as the city works through its fiscal recovery plan.

 

Several council members who sided with the city Tuesday said they simply did not have faith the city could cover the cost of raises for employees, despite projections that about $40 million will be deposited into the city's reserves over the next two years.

 

Council chairman TaJuan Stout Mitchell said that while her decision to endorse the city's position was not popular with employees, it was a "courageous" act for the city's citizens.

 

"It is right for the taxpayers of this city when I am not certain if the projections are going to be accurate or not," Mitchell said.

 

Council member Barbara Swearengen Holt said she also wasn't convinced about the city's budget projection, adding, "You can't get blood out of a turnip."

 

City finance officials said raises proposed by all the unions would cost at least $11 million, a figure disputed by union officials Tuesday. They said it was closer to $4 million.

 

The council's decision was greeted by a chorus of boos from police officers, who filled the chambers Tuesday.

 

"I voted my conscience," said council member E.C. Jones, who supported the union.

 

Tommy Turner, police union president, said later he was "not surprised at all" by the decision. He said he had seen a trend of votes against unions in the recent impasse hearings.

 

Voting in favor of the city and against the raise were Edmund Ford, Holt, Scott McCormick, Mitchell, Rickey Peete, Jack Sammons and Brent Taylor. Siding with the union were Dedrick Brittenum, Joe Brown, Carol Chumney, Jones and Myron Lowery. Tom Marshall was absent.

 

 

 

Officer Pay Raise Plan Stirs Controversy

From WRTV6, May 18, 2006

 

INDIANAPOLIS - An Indianapolis police pay raise offer from Indianapolis Mayor Bart Peterson is drawing fire from the Fraternal Order of Police.

 

Peterson made his pitch during a citywide roll call meeting on Wednesday afternoon.

 

The pay raise would put IPD officer pay on par with that of the Marion County Sheriff's Department.

 

FOP president Vince Huber said he's concerned that the plan doesn't directly provide more money for officers with more experience and training.

 

"We don't want Indianapolis to lose any veteran officers to other cities paying more salary and better benefits," Huber said.

 

The plan would give most IPD officers between a 3 percent and 6 percent raise.

 

Peterson said the raise was made possible because of revenue generated by raising the county option income tax.

 

Police supervisors union stands pat

From the Chicago Tribune, May 17, 2006

 

JOLIET - Joliet's police supervisors union will continue trying to "educate" City Council members about contract negotiations, said Sgt. John Albrecht, union president.

Albrecht presented the union's case Monday night in a regular pre-council meeting, in what he said was a response to City Atty. Jeff Plyman's written warning to stop contacting council members who will vote on the union contract.

Albrecht said the union is trying to educate, rather than lobby, the elected representatives. "It is not an unfair labor practice for us to try to reach out," he told the council.

The 54 sergeants, lieutenants and captains represented by the union have worked for the last 18 months without a contract. Public-safety employees cannot strike.

A federal arbitrator is mediating the discussions with the supervisors union, according to Plyman, noting the union representing rank-and-file police officers also separately is in federal mediation.

Albrecht, watched by approximately 20 police supervisors, said the union feels "a high level of frustration" because the city won't extend to the supervisors union the same benefits granted to the three other public-safety unions, which represent Fire Department supervisors and rank and file Fire and Police Department personnel.

Albrecht said city representatives have characterized those benefits for police supervisors as "breakthrough issues."

"The frustration level is very high," he said.

"In contract talks we are treated as second-class employees."

 

3 major police unions press for more officers

From the Boston Globe, May 17, 2006

 

Officials from the three major police unions appeared at the City Council's budget hearings last night to advocate for hiring more police officers, union officials said yesterday.

 

The lobbying effort was made on the same day that the City Council's Special Committee on Youth Violent Crime Prevention also called for more officers as it released a preliminary report detailing the correlation between police staffing and violence.

 

Councilor Michael Ross, who is chairman of the committee, said that the city must find more money for police officers despite losing millions of dollars in state and federal funding.

 

''The more police on the street, the lower the violence, but we can't do it with $85 million less than we've had in the past," he said. ''It's not acceptable for us to use that as an excuse.  We have to find a way of doing it."

 

Mayor Thomas M. Menino has so far said that the city cannot afford hundreds more officers. The department has about 1,350 patrol officers, down from about 1,460 in 2000.

 

Robert Kenney, president of the Boston Police Detectives Benevolent Society, said he and patrol officers' union head Thomas J. Nee discussed the importance of a strong police presence at the hearing.

 

''We're down a lot of people, and we can't perform our major function," Kenney said. ''A lot of people have been hurt and killed, and I truly believe that it's due to the lack of manpower."

 

Kenney said he does not plan on pushing for pay raises at the hearing because he is far more concerned that money be spent hiring more police.

 

City Councilor Robert Consalvo, chairman of the council's Ways and Means Committee, said he is committed to finding the money for more police. He said last night's hearing was designed to give police officials a forum to address the department's policy and funding priorities before the council.

 

''I think it's clear to everybody that we need to put more officers on the street," Consalvo said. ''I am confident that this budget will include money for more officers."

 

 

Big boost in Barstow police pay

Council votes 3-2 for a 25 percent salary increase to compete with other law enforcement agencies

From the Desert Dispatch, May 17, 2006

 

BARSTOW - City council members emerged from closed session and announced a 25 percent pay hike for Barstow Police Department officers.

 

Voting 3-2 for the raise, council members cited competitive forces of other agencies vying for trained and experienced officers as the reason for voting to modify the present Memorandums of Agreement (MOA) that were set to expire in 2007.

 

The new agreement means a $10,517 raise for an officer earning the base pay rate of $42,068 per year.

 

Det. Joe Silva said he is hoping that it will "make us more attractive to the candidates down in the valley."

In addition to the pay modification for Units Three and Eight the Barstow Police Association and the Police Officer Management Association the MOAs were extended an additional year.

 

Mayor Lawrence Dale said he was opposed to the agreement and voted against it because it doesn't leave funds in the city budget for any other employee group, but in fairness to them the council agreed to negotiate with the other three city employee groups.

 

Also voting against the modification was council member Paul Luellig Jr. who said he's afraid the city is returning to an era of fiscal irresponsibility.

 

While both Dale and Luellig praised the Barstow police force as the finest in the state they agreed that it is unfair to all the other city workers who are also quality employees.

 

"We jumped off the deep end and slashed a knife across the jugular of this city." Dale said.

 

And echoing that concern, Luellig said that Barstow was one of only three cities in the state that did not have to lay off public employees when the budget crisis hit Califor nia several years ago.

 

But he said this raise will put Barstow $1.5 million in the red for the next four years.

 

Council member Gloria Darling said she voted for the raise because Barstow has been suffering the loss of good personnel for the past five years.

 

"We can't get people that qualify to come to Barstow," she said.

 

But Dale decried deficit spending and said the city will have to reduce people down the road if new sources of revenue are not found.

The meeting was attended by a large group of officers and other supporters who took tur ns speaking in favor of the department and Lt. Rudy Alcantara praised the council's decision. He said it will greatly assist the department's retention efforts.

 

Joe Gomez, City Council member, said he "is proud of our police department" and that public safety issues are his first priority.

While also citing retention concerns, Gomez appealed to local officers to convince the disgruntled members and those ready to leave that things are going to get better.

 

Although he agreed that council needs to address the public safety concerns, especially attrition of trained officers, Luellig said that the average total compensation package for a police officer in Barstow is $147,000 per year and that every dollar increase in pay also costs the city 41 cents in benefits.

 

While Darling made it clear that none of the money is coming from the new hospital trust fund, Dale and other officials, speculated that $300,000 of the $724,000 total cost of this proposal can come from interest ear ned on the $12 million hospital fund.

 

City Spokesman John Rader said that the entire amount of public safety funding comes from the city's general fund and will be included in a budget proposal presented by Interim City Manager Hector Rodriguez.

 

While the agreement remains to be ratified by the police union membership, Albert Toro, a spokesman for the Barstow Police Association, said he is pleased with the adjustment and the council for acting responsibly and predicted that the membership will vote to accept it.

 

Toro also predicted that the lateral movement of trained and experienced officers will begin moving towards Barstow.

City, county approve budgets

 

 

Spending limit at $1.1B; more police, firefighters sought

From the ARIZONA DAILY STAR, May 17, 2006

 

The Tucson City Council tentatively approved a $1.1 billion budget Tuesday, setting the cap for next fiscal year's spending plan.

Although the council gave its unanimous approval to the plan, which would increase the number of police and firefighters, repair city streets and improve Tucson parks, Councilwoman Carol West voiced concern over the process of adopting the budget. The fiscal year begins July 1.

 

West said City Manager Mike Hein's budget — which includes the first year of his 10-year, $784 million program to expand services — was difficult for her to decipher.

 

For residents looking to find specific numbers in Hein's budget, West said "heaven help" them. She also said the budget provides no guidance for the city's Downtown Rio Nuevo redevelopment project, and what might be spent on that program.

 

"It just hasn't been a very good process," West said, citing that the city is still bargaining with some employee labor groups and the fact that the budget process got started late.

 

Hein is proposing 43 new police officers and 41 more firefighters and paramedics next fiscal year.

 

He also wants to put an extra $4 million into expanded road maintenance and $2.1 million for additional recreation programming and facilities and additional child and family programs.

 

West said she voted for the tentative spending plan because it is simply a cap for how high the budget can go. The council will hold a public hearing June 13 before adopting the budget.

 

The budget only includes limited funding for pay raises, with 2 percent for civilian employees, 3 percent for public safety officers and no merit increases. The highest-paid employees would get no raises, with that cutoff yet to be set.

 

Linda Hatfield, who represents the city's white-collar workers, told the council that the raises aren't competitive with other cities in Arizona.

 

Hatfield said the average raise this year in Arizona was a 4 percent raise with an additional merit increase.

 

Immigration tensions continue

 

The meeting was also the site of both pro-immigrant and anti-illegal-immigrant groups voicing concerns about the immigrants-rights march and rally that occurred April 10.

 

Caroline Isaacs, who represents groups that staged the immigrant march and rally, called a recent report by Tucson police about how its officers handled the event and a counterprotest "superficial and cursory." She called for an independent review of police actions during the rally and counterprotest, where a Mexican flag was burned.

 

The council meeting was followed by a tense anti-illegal-immigration rally led by Roy Warden outside the council chambers. During the council meeting, Warden threatened violence against anyone who crossed his free-speech perimeter during his flag-burning demonstration.

 

After the meeting, the 58-year-old Warden, who was arrested on suspicion of assault, criminal damage and reckless burning after burning a Mexican flag during the April 10 counterprotest, announced he was going to retrieve his handgun after seeing pro-immigrant protesters in his roped-off free-speech area outside council chambers.

 

Upon returning with a gun in a holster on his hip, Warden moved to a new area and told pro-immigration supporters that there was a "new sheriff in town that's me."

 

About 15 Tucson police officers kept the pro- and anti-immigration groups separated.

 

"You're damn lucky the police were here," Warden told pro-immigration supporters.

 

Warden did not burn a Mexican flag. No arrests were made.

 

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net