The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, April 5, 2007

JOIN THE POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List 

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 701-8616  

UPCOMING POLICEPAY.NET SEMINAR’S                     

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS         -      May 1st Los Angeles Area

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS         -     May 3rd  San Francisco Area

NEW ORLEANS, LA

RAND: To recruit cops, Orleans should raise pay, lower pensions

MILWAUKEE, WI

Police Union Proposes Change To Fired Officers' Paycheck Policy

OMAHA, NE

Pension Squeeze

PASCO COUNTY, FL

Sheriff, deputies at an impasse

McALLEN, TX

Binding arbitration off the ballot

MARION, IL

Marion police union rejects contract offer

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

POLICEPAY.NET SERVICES

(Click on service name for information and pricing)

CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS  NEGOTIATIONS RESEARCH

 

RAND: To recruit cops, Orleans should raise pay, lower pensions

From NOLA.com, March 30, 2007

 

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — New Orleans might be able to get the higher pay it needs to attract new police officers by scaling back the department's "extremely generous" retirement benefits for recruits, the mayor, police chief and RAND Corp. consultants said.

 

The department, where starting pay is $33,000 and a second-year officer gets $37,000, currently has 1,388 officers. About 30 recruits are scheduled to graduate Monday, Superintendent Warren Riley said Friday.

 

Before Hurricane Katrina, the department had 1,742 officers, and had a budget for 1,885.

 

It has lost more than 400 since Hurricane Katrina and has hired only about 60, Riley said. "This year alone we have lost 42 police officers," he said.

 

A RAND study suggesting ways to do that notes that officers with 30 years on the force can retire at full pay, and 25-year veterans get 83 percent of their salary as retirement pay. But prospective recruits anywhere are much more interested in pay now than in what they may get decades in the future, the report said.

 

That holds true in New Orleans: most of the officers who leave have been with the department between four and 10 years, so cutting retirement benefits for newly hired officers in exchange for higher pay early on could work, Riley said.

 

The report also suggested hiring civilians to do much of the department's clerical work, speeding up work to fix the headquarters and district stations, and offering houses to recruits who agree to stay for a specific number of years.

 

Some steps already are being taken — report author Bernard Rostker said he has talked with the city's Civil Service board about a proposal to give promotion exams every 12 to 18 months rather than every 3 to 5 years.

 

The report said many junior officers had not received promotions they already had earned because of the city's money troubles. That is no longer true, Riley said — all of those officers now have those raises, some after years of waiting. The newest class should get its first 5 percent step up in 40 days, he said.

 

"One of the things that has been most gratifying is the speed with which the mayor took our recommendations and moved with them," Rostker said.

 

 

 

Police Union Proposes Change To Fired Officers' Paycheck Policy

From WISN.com, April 3, 2007

 

MILWAUKEE -- A controversial policy allowing Milwaukee police officers to collect pay even after they're charged with a felony could soon be ending.

 

The Milwaukee Police Union has proposed the changed. Police Chief Nan Hegerty and many others have been highly critical of the state law, which is believed to be unique in the nation.

 

The attack of Frank Jude at a Bayview house party three years ago brought the issue to a boil. Hegerty fired nine off-duty officers in the aftermath of that case, including two, Daniel Masarik and Andrew Spengler, who continued to receive paychecks as they awaited their federal trials.

 

In another case, former officer Steven Lelinski was fired in August of 2006 after he was charged with sexual assualt. He continued to be paid until he was sentenced last week, collecting an income of more than $36,000.

 

The Milwaukee Police Union now has the position that an officer's pay would stop as soon as they are bound over for trial on a felony charge.

 

"I don't know of any officer who thinks that an officer dealing drugs should continue to get paid. There's not a police officer on this job that would say he should continue to get paid. But you have to keep in mind, you have a system in this place in this country, and it's called the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights," Union President John Balcerzak told 12 News' Nick Bohr.

 

Balcerzak said the union would also like to see an independent arbitrator rule on police discipline, even offering to pay half the cost, which would free up the bogged-down fire and police commission, which currently handles reviews of discipline.

 

"They'd be able to focus on what they should be doing. They'd be able to focus on the citizen complaints that come into the fire and police commission. They'd be able to focus on the trianing aspects. We know over the past few years that we need to improve our training. We need to improve our recruiting of police officers, get a higher standard of police officer, Balcerzak said.

 

State Representative Barbara Toles proposed a bill in the last session to end the pay-until-sentenced practice, but it was shot down. With the added willingness to negotiate from the police union, a similar bill would seem to have a better chance of passing this time around.

 

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett remains hopeful from his talks with the police union and said he's still optimistic they can present a united front to the Wisconsin Legislature later this spring.

 

Pension Squeeze

"Spiking" eyed as culprit

From WOWT.com, March 30, 2007

 

A new report on police and fire pensions spells out money trouble for the city. On paper, Omaha comes up $280 million short in the fund and a longtime practice is named as a big part of the problem.

 

City officials say so-called spiking is the trouble spot and Mayor Mike Fahey says spiking has to go.

 

Spiking is when police officers and firefighters boost their pensions in the last years on the job.

 

Since the pension payout, what is earned for the rest of the employee's life, is determined by a percentage of their highest paychecks, police officers and firefighters typically volunteer for extra shifts and cash in stockpiled comp time. That is adding to the pension problems more than expected.

 

These are the latest numbers revealed to the police and fire pension board. For 2006, the fund had $453 million in assets and $733 million in liabilities.

 

Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey says, "I think if we address it the way we should, take out the spikes is what they're talking about, which is what our intentions are to do, we'll get this down to a more manageable level. But we're not going to change it overnight."

 

Omaha City Councilman Chuck Sigerson says, "If we correct it now, we won't have trouble 20 years from now."

 

Sigerson and a handful of others have been sounding the pension alarm for the past three years.

 

While the pension plan isn't in jeopardy of collapsing, (very few pension plans are fully-funded anymore) something has to give.

 

Sigerson says the city needs to, "correct the percentage of money going in or decrease the money going out: one of the two, just like you would do with the mortgage or credit cards."

 

Two major items contributed to the pension woes. The tech-bubble bursting in 2000 cost the pension plan some serious cash in loss of investments and a strapped-for-cash City of Omaha in 2004 traded a better pension deal for frozen wages from police and fire.

 

Fahey says, "I wish we weren't $10 million in the hole back then. A lot of this was done because we were trying to hold off a property tax increase."

 

All of this surfaced as the police and fire unions began contract talks. Negotiations started last week for the fire union. Both contracts expire at the end of the year.

 

The attorney for the unions is not commenting. He hasn't read the consultant's report and wants to research the assumptions used to compile the numbers before reacting.

 

 

Sheriff, deputies at an impasse

Gap health insurance and the use of an outside arbitrator are the sticking points.

From the St. Petersburg Times, April 3, 2007

 

After a month of deadlocked contract negotiations with Sheriff Bob White, Pasco's sheriff's deputies on Monday declared an impasse.

 

They created a Web site, www.supportyourdeputies.com, to publicly air their grievances. They also plan to send brochures to local business owners in hopes of stirring up support.

 

The deputies' gripes against White - which include their desire for gap health insurance coverage for retirees and the right to appeal disciplinary decisions to an outside arbitrator - are detailed on the Web site.

 

So is their disdain toward the sheriff.

 

"Sheriff White will not afford his own deputies the basic benefits he enjoyed as a law enforcement officer," the site reads.

 

It concludes: "This is about the Sheriff against his Deputies, not the Deputies against the Sheriff."

 

Paul Noeske, staff representative with the Fraternal Order of Police, which represents the deputies at the bargaining table, said the union sent a letter last week to the sheriff's attorney saying deputies were about to go public with their grievances.

 

The sheriff's attorney, Wayne Helsby, did not return a call Monday for comment.

 

Sheriff's spokesman Kevin Doll referred all questions in this matter to Helsby.

 

In an interview last month, White listed other perks he has provided to the deputies, including better extra-duty pay, new cars for detectives and new gym equipment. But he declined to say why he wouldn't grant the requests for gap insurance or an outside appeal of disciplinary decisions.

 

"This is between my deputies and I," White said last month. "Just because we've disagreed on a few issues doesn't mean we've had a falling-out."

 

With the declaration of an impasse, however, the deputies plan to take their grievances to the public, both through the Web site and brochures that will be sent to local businesses.

 

"We just hope to come to an agreement," Noeske said. "We expect to have a contract like other places do."

 

Noeske said if White and the union don't come to an agreement by April 14, a hearing will be held before a magistrate. The magistrate will then make a nonbinding recommendation on the terms of the contract, Noeske said.

 

If the two parties still can't agree, then White may impose a contract on the deputies, said Matt Puckett, deputy executive director for the Florida Police Benevolent Association in Tallahassee.

 

"Right now," he said, "the sheriff holds all the cards."

 

Binding arbitration off the ballot

From the Monitor, April 3, 2007

 

McALLEN — Two propositions asking voters to decide whether the city should use binding arbitration to settle disputes with the police and fire unions won’t appear on the May 12 ballot, officials announced Tuesday.

City commissioners decided to remove both a union proposition, which asks voters to allow binding arbitration, and their own ballot measure, which asks voters to reject it.

The decision comes less than a week after a state district court ruled the city’s proposed language for both measures was confusing and misleading. Judge Aida Salinas Flores barred the city from putting either proposition on the ballot until it revised the language.

“The court did not give us clear direction as to problems with the proposed language,” Mayor Richard Cortez said in a written statement. “So there is a risk that even new language may not be acceptable to the court.”

Commissioners also decided they did not have enough time to revise the language before today’s state-mandated deadline on printing mail-in ballots, city attorney Kevin Pagan said.

Mike Zellers, president of the McAllen Police Officers Union, called the decision a “stalling tactic” to avoid posing the issue to city voters. Union representatives have offered to work with the city on new language for the ballot measures but have not received any response, he said.

“What they’re doing is illegal,” he said. “They have had time to work on revised language but have chosen not to do so.”

The City Commission voted both propositions onto the ballot last month after receiving a 3,300-signature petition asking for a referendum on the issue.

Adopting binding arbitration would force both parties to argue their case before an independent panel and abide by its ruling whenever future negotiations reach an impasse. Union members have strongly supported the measure since October, when talks on the latest police contract reached an impasse over the city’s contribution to officers’ retirement funds.

City officials plan to appeal the court’s ruling and post some form of the contested propositions on a future ballot, Pagan said.

 

Marion police union rejects contract offer

From the Marion Daily Republican, March 30, 2007 11:32 AM CDT

MARION (IL)— After the membership of the Marion Fraternal Order of Police overwhelmingly rejected the City's latest contract proposal, arbitration is the next step.

The union and City have been working on a new three-year contract, but two major issues have prevented agreement.

Union representative Bill Mehrtens said that the membership felt the City's latest offer was insufficient.

 

According to Mehrtens the city initially wanted its police officers to live within a 10-mile radius of city hall rather than within 10 miles of the city limits which is the current Standard.

The City's amended proposal would allow current officers to maintain the status quo with residency, but that new hires would be required to adhere to the new standard.

"Residency is a big issue," Mehrtens said. "The membership saw potential problems with one set of officers working under one set of rules and any new hires working under a different set."

 

The second sticking point involves length of work days and wages.

"The City wants to increase the number of hours an officers is on duty and pay them at straight hourly wage," Mehrtens said. "The rank and file membership was not prepared to accept that."

An arbitration meeting will be scheduled as soon as possible to work out differences.

A meeting with arbitrator scheduled for Wednesday was cancelled because initial indications were that an agreement was near.

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2007 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

219 West Boyd St, Suite 205

Norman, OK 73069

(405) 701-8616

www.policepay.net