The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, March 16, 2006

www.policepayjournal.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

 

 

ALABAMA

Trooper Pay Raise Could Negatively Impact Local Police

BEXAR COUNTY, TX

Jailers Union Likes Counter Offer

LADY LUCK, FL

Future Of Negotiations Between Lady Lake, Police Union In Limbo

LINCOLN, MA

Board, Union OK Contract

POLICEPAY.NET

2006 POLICEPAY INDEX

                                             BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

Trooper Pay Raise Could Negatively Impact Local Police And Sheriff's Departments
From, WSLA.com, March 15, 2006

 

Elmore County Sheriff's Deputy Travis Hough may truly be among the few and the proud. The few deputies who won't give in to the lure of more money as a state trooper, and proud to say he intends to retire from the Elmore County Sheriff's Department. That kind of dedication even though he could drive up his pay by $6,000 by becoming a state trooper this summer.

 

"If money is what you want and you gotta have it, that's fine. I like where I'm at," said Hough.

 

With the stroke of a pen, Governor Bob Riley signed the trooper pay raise into law, giving troopers a raise ranging from 5 to 10%, pushing the starting salary to more than $30,000 a year.

 

"This will make Alabama the 5th highest in 14 southern states," Governor Riley said on Tuesday.

 

Montgomery Police Chief Art Baylor doesn't expect the trooper pay raise to affect his force because the starting pay is already thirty-thousand plus but Baylor remembers when it did.

 

"We had people leave to become state troopers and we still have some," Baylor said.

 

But not as many. On the other hand, the trooper raise could, in fact, have the opposite affect; give local sheriffs and chiefs the ammunition they need to get something for their department.

 

"We go to the county commission and say 'hey, these other people are getting passes again," Elmore County Sheriff Bill Franklin said.

But sometimes money isn't everything. A state trooper, for example, is often reassigned to different posts throughout the state not so for police officers and deputies.

 

"You do get promoted and would be expected to live where you're assigned," said trooper Donald Frazier.

 

"I'm from Elmore County," said Hough.

 

Deputy Travis Hough could earn more money for sure, but he says there's something about being in the driver's seat in his home county.

And speaking of pay raises, Chief Baylor says he's working on a deal to increase the pay in general for his police force but it'll be up to Montgomery Mayor Bobby Bright. No word yet when and if that might happen.

 

Sheriff Franklin, meantime, says they typically get a yearly raise of two-and-a-half percent. Troopers get their raises beginning June 1.

 

 

Jailers union likes counteroffer

From the Express-News, March 9, 2006

 

Deputies and Bexar County negotiators now are on the same page in collective bargaining talks, both sides said Wednesday, although they still have some philosophical differences.

 

The county presented a market study for its $25.4 million, three-year counteroffer to the Deputy Sheriffs Association of Bexar County, and the union's representatives were receptive.

 

"The committee feels that is a very fair number," said Mike Reimherr, the union's financial consultant. "When you add our numbers up, it comes very close to their numbers."

 

That wasn't the same conclusion reached by county staff members in January when they crunched the union's initial proposal, coming up with a three-year cost of $176 million.

 

Reimherr said he wasn't aware of that calculation.

 

"I just think somebody made a mistake there Obviously, we wouldn't have agreed to $25 (million) if $176 (million) was our number," he said.

 

The union negotiators said they would accept the $25.4 million cap, working out the details later, in return for an immediate 3.5 percent cost-of-living raise. Because of collective bargaining, deputies did not get that raise at the beginning of the county's fiscal year.

 

The county is considering that, said Lowell Denton, the county's negotiating lawyer.

 

It is in the county's interest to pay deputies a fair market rate to reduce turnover, he said, and in that sense the county's and the union's interests coincide.

 

Denton said the county is focused on the gap between Bexar deputies and those in 10 other large urban Texas markets.

 

But the union, which has mostly detention officer members, wants to close a different gap — the one between jailers and law enforcement deputies.

 

Reimherr said better pay for jailers would help resolve the county's problem of maintaining a proper guard-to-inmate ratio.

 

The county will consider that, Denton said, but he sees it as a fundamental difference.

 

"If their goal is that we pay Bexar County detention officers more than everybody else (in the) market," he said, "then I think that's going to be a hard sell."

 

 

Future of negotiations between Lady Lake, police union in limbo

From the DAILY SUN, March 16, 2006

 

LADY LAKE — It’s unclear whether a deadlock in contract negotiations between the town and the union representing its police officers will mean the end of the Lady Lake Police Department.

Paul Noeske, the Fraternal Order of Police’s chief negotiator for the Lady Lake contract, said recent statements made by Town Manager Bill Vance have several Lady Lake officers wondering whether they have a future with the town.

“I’ve heard from several rank and file who are concerned about their jobs,” Noeske said.

Fueling the rumors is the closing line of a March 10 press release Vance issued, which states “it seems to be absolutely necessary for the town commission and town manager to reassess all options concerning how best to provide public safety services to Lady Lake citizens.”

When asked Tuesday if he is threatening to eliminate the department, Vance replied, “I always want the town of Lady Lake to have a police department, but it’s been proven to me that an alleged neutral arbitrator does not consider insubordination as cause for the dismissal of a Lady Lake police officer and, therefore, our chief of police is ultimately not in control of his department.”

The FOP and town are at loggerheads over the issue of binding arbitration, a matter that surfaced when the town lost a grievance case and was forced to rehire an officer who the town claims was insubordinate to Police Chief Ed Nathanson. The town suggested replacing an arbitrator with a citizens review panel, but the FOP local membership voted down that proposal, the second time the union voted down a contract with the town.

 

Noeske said it appears that Vance’s long-range intent is to abolish the Lady Lake Police Department.

“It’s clear he’s talking about bringing in the [Lake County] Sheriff’s Office and doing away with the department,” Noeske said.

Asked if he has contacted Lake County Sheriff Chris Daniels to inquire about the Sheriff’s Office possibly taking over future policing duties in Lady Lake, Vance said he spoke with Daniels months ago regarding backup for officers Vance believed had been abusing sick time.

“The town was having trouble filling shifts because so many police officers were calling in sick.” Vance said. “We might need [Lake County’s] assistance in regard to emergency service calls regarding Lady Lake citizens due to the fact that we were short-handed on a regular basis.”

Nathanson said despite the speculation that followed Vance’s press release, he’s confident that the police department isn’t going anywhere.

“We’re not getting rid of the police department,” Nathanson said. Lady Lake “wouldn’t invest all that money and infrastructure if they were going to do away with it.”

Emphasizing his point, Nathanson says, “I still plan on retiring here.”

But he still does not know how to interpret Vance’s statement in the press release, he says.

“What those options are, that’s for Mr. Vance and the town commissioners to decide,” Nathanson said.

Nathanson added that there have been “allegations” that discussions regarding the union’s unresolved contract status have seeped into the day-to-day operations of the police department, but the chief claimed he has tried to squelch any such talk.

The officers “have been warned not to do it, or they know I will deal with them accordingly,” he said. “It’s not going to happen.”

Attorney Wayne Helsby, representing the town, recently sent the FOP a letter stating that if the FOP membership does not accept a citizens review board within 30 days, the town will revoke its offer of a retroactive 5 percent pay raise for all officers.

Noeske contends the town has the right to “pull back” that offer, but said the town is “attempting to coerce membership to reconsider another time.”

Vance said the commission and certain staff members will hold a closed-door session Thursday to discuss their next move.

“What I’m saying is the FOP will not accept Lady Lake citizens determining the future success of the police department and its officers, so I think it appropriate for the town commission and town manager to re-examine all potential options regarding the provision of future public safety services to Lady Lake citizens,” he said.

 

 

Board, union OK contract
From the Lincoln Journal, March 16, 2005

Cost of living salary increases and acknowledgement for certain certifications are two of the additions in the town's new contract with the Lincoln Police Officers Association.

 

The Board of Selectmen voted unanimously Monday night to approve a new three-year contract with the association. The new contract is in effect through June 30, 2008.

The association's previous contract expired June 30, 2005.

 

"We had pleasant negotiations," said Lincoln Police Chief Kevin Mooney. "I think they, as usual, come into the union with the idea that it's a compromise."

 

After the meeting, union President Detective John Wentworth said the new contract contains more streamlined language to reflect current laws and labor laws. The contract also eliminated previous ambiguities in its language. It specifies the responsibilities of officers assigned to the Northeast Metropolitan Law Enforcement Council, also known as NEMLEC.

 

The contract provides for a 3 percent salary increase in fiscal 2006, and a 2 1/2 percent increase for fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008. It allows for stipends to acknowledge officers who complete and keep up certain certifications, and includes language regarding defibrillators, which will soon be placed in each police cruiser.

 

Mooney said the contract also ties up loose language for the probationary period for new police officers.

 

"It was an overall streamlining and reorganizing of the contract," Wentworth said.

 

Mooney said negotiations went smoothly, to the credit of Wentworth and Vice President Officer Dave Regan, as well as Lt. Kevin Kennedy and Sgt. Sean Kennedy, who were also involved in the negotiations.

 

"I think it's been a lot of work on their part and I think it's to their credit," Mooney said.

 

"We just want to thank you very much for working with us," said Selectman Gary Taylor.

 

Wentworth said Town Administrator Tim Higgins and Assistant Town Administrator Anita Scheipers have a difficult task when it comes to balancing the union's needs and those of the town. He said both were true professionals throughout the process.

 

"It came through rather seamless and it didn't take a long time to get it done," Wentworth said.

 

Selectman Sara Mattes said she was happy to see collaborative teamwork take place.

 

"It makes me personally very proud," she said.

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net