The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, February 16, 2006

POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List (Receive new issues by e-mail)   www.policepay.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

NEGOTIATING THE CONTRACT SEMINAR DVD

NOW AVAILABLE (CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS)

 

 

ST. LOUIS, MO

Police Board OKs Raises for officers

WASHINGTON STATE

State Troopers & Governor Settle on Wage Contract

FAIRFAX, VA

Benefiting Public Safety

ANACORTES, WA

Police officers win 11.5% pay increase in arbitration

WARREN, RI

Town Council ratifies new police contract

POLICEPAY.NET

2006 POLICEPAY INDEX

Look At The Last Issue (2/9/05)

 

Police Board OKs Raises for officers

From ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH, February 15, 2006


The St. Louis Police Board - acting over Mayor Francis Slay's objection - approved a budget Wednesday for the coming fiscal year that includes a $5.4 million increase in officers' salaries.

"St. Louis police officers certainly deserve good pay, health-care benefits and a decent pension, but how are we going to pay for it?" Slay asked. "I wish we had the money, but money doesn't come out of the air."

Before the 4-1 vote, Slay urged the Police Board to delay the raise for another year. As mayor, he is an automatic member of the board, serving beside four gubernatorial appointees who together oversee the department.

Board Vice President Michael J. Quinn said, "We can't under-compensate our officers." He added, "We've got a responsibility, too." Quinn cited morale as a factor in the proposed raise, which still requires approval of the Legislature.


Under an unusual arrangement dating to the Civil War era, the state dictates St. Louis police spending and the city pays for it. The Police Board promised to cooperate with City Hall to meet the new budget. Compromises have been worked out in past years if the city could not provide enough cash to meet the budget.

The proposed budget, which would go into effect July 1, is for $142,322,876, which represents about a 5.2 percent increase over this year's.

Besides better pay for officers, Chief Joe Mokwa said, the new budget includes $400,000 for a 2 percent pay increase for civilian employees, $645,000 for improved DNA testing capabilities and computer programming, $143,000 to improve high-speed wireless communications, $340,000 in uniform expenses, $488,000 in expected gasoline price increases, $699,000 in overtime for policing major events such as the Mardi Gras and Fair St. Louis, and $1.1 million in capital improvements that include various roof and parking lot repairs.

Wednesday's meeting was the last for the board's president, Bart Saracino, whose four-year term is expiring. Mokwa presented him with a plaque.

Gov. Matt Blunt named former KMOV (Channel 4) news anchor Julius Hunter to replace Saracino; a vote on Senate confirmation of Hunter is expected next week.

Once Hunter is on the board, it will elect a new president.

 

 

State Troopers & Governor Settle on Wage Contract
From the Washington
State Patrol Troopers Association, February 14, 2006

OLYMPIA, Wash., Feb. 14 /PRNewswire/ -- The 2005 Legislature passed and the Governor approved a major change in the collective bargaining rights for the members of the Washington State Patrol Troopers Association. Troopers now have the right to bargain for wages with the Governor in the same fashion as other state employees. And the first wage agreement under this new authority was reached on January 3, 2006. The agreement was for salary increases for the second year of the 05/07 biennium and, if approved by the legislature, would give state troopers an additional 2.6% salary boost on July 1, 2006. The members of the Troopers Association completed the ratification of the agreement on February 10 with an impressive 97% approval vote.

"This is truly a historic event," Tom Pillow, Troopers Association President, said; "this agreement represents the first time in the 76 year history of the state patrol that the employees participated in the discussions and negotiations regarding rank and file salary levels!" Pillow emphasized that "this has been a great learning experience for the Association members" that participated in the bargaining and "will give us the opportunity to take a more active role in future wage negotiations. It is very exciting."

The Troopers Association has had bargaining rights for working conditions since the mid-80's, and was successful in removing a wage-related item restriction in 1999. But the bill passed in 2005 was the "biggest bargaining change since the working conditions bill in 1986" Pillow reflected, "we now have the complete package." And it comes at a critical time; "we have fallen critically behind other police agencies in the state which has affected recruitment and retention of trained officers. This partnership between the employees, the Governor, and the Legislature is a big step in getting WSP pay levels comparable to our law enforcement colleagues."

According to the law, any salary agreement must be approved and funded by the legislature. And since the negotiations began late in the year the agreement was not complete until after the October 1 deadline for inclusion in the Governor's supplemental budget proposal. "Our work is not done," Pillow cautioned, "we now must convince the legislature to fund the July 1 pay increase. We have been told that revenue does exist for the 2.6% pay boost and we are optimistic the legislature will appreciate the need."

A new round of bargaining for the 07-09 biennium will commence in April. But for now the Association leadership is hopefully that, with gubernatorial support, the legislature will approve the first wage bargaining agreement ever struck between the members of the Troopers Association and the Governor!

 

Benefiting Public Safety
Council approves new pay plan for city fire, police departments.
From The Fairfax Connection, February 10, 2006

 

Firefighters and police officers in the City of Fairfax will benefit from a new pay plan the City Council approved at its Tuesday, Feb. 3 meeting.


The pay plan will allow the City of Fairfax public safety departments to become more competitive with those of surrounding jurisdictions, said City of Fairfax personnel director Larry Brock at the City Council work session. Right now, he said, the City of Fairfax Fire Department is losing firefighters and emergency personnel to counties and cities who have more attractive salaries and health plans.

Fairfax County is, by far, the greatest threat to recruitment and retention at the city fire and police departments, said Brock.


"There is a definite increase and growing competition in the region for firefighters," he said. "It's really getting out of hand." The Fairfax County Fire and Rescue Department provides housing for new recruits, he said, while in Prince William County, firefighters receive a $3,000 signing bonus as well as referral and retention bonuses. The city averages only four candidates per entrance examination, said Brock. The competition from the neighboring jurisdictions, coupled with a smaller pool of applicants and the high turnover rate the city fire department has experienced since 2000, led a public safety task force to consider a better pay plan for employees.

Both the police and fire department pay plans will use the Fairfax County entry-level salary as an "anchor point" on which to build a pay structure. The new plan will add a referral bonus to encourage current employees to recruit new members, as well as "longevity step" to the pay plan that employees would be eligible for after 15 years. It will also add riding pay for employees with certification in advanced life support.

"We are struggling on the recruitment side and we run the risk of losing the very capable workforce we have," said Owens. Many of the long-time fire department employees, hired during a period of rapid county growth in the 1970s, are reaching retirement age.

TODAY, BORDERING areas such as Stafford and Loudoun counties are experiencing another population boom, and so new firefighters are in hot demand.

"I tell folks, 'If you're a young person in this area with a firefighter's and paramedic certification, you can work in any jurisdiction,'" Owens said.

A large pool of qualified applicants is vital for public safety departments to be effective, said Col. Rick Rappoport, chief of the City of Fairfax Police Department.

"The quality of service degrades with a limited pool of applicants," he said.

The city police department has always operated on parity with the fire department, said Brock, and so the task force recommended a similar pay plan for the police, that would be part of the 2007 budget. The police pay plan would affect salaries and benefits but not premium pay, said Brock.

In all, he said, the pay plan overhaul would cost $1.1 million between the police and fire departments for fiscal year 2007.
The department's pay plan will go into effect July 1, and the city fire department pay plan will be effective from Jan. 1, 2006 with retroactive pay adjustments for employees.

They agreed that the plan was necessary for the continued operation of the city fire and police departments. Councilmember Scott Silverthorne said he was concerned that city firefighters, who share calls with Fairfax County, work in the county more than county firefighters work in the city.

"I think it ought to be a little more even, and perhaps we should make it even," said Councilmember Scott Silverthorne.


Council members approved the pay plan unanimously, as well as a $339,000 appropriation resolution for the 2006 adjustment to the plan.


IN THE WORK session, the City of Fairfax Fire and Rescue Department also asked to add a new position to its roster: an emergency management specialist, who would develop an emergency plan for the city and make sure its resources were in order in case a catastrophic event or terrorist incident occurred.

"We are all now in some way, shape or form, engaged in this process," said Owens. However, he said, public safety personnel are stretched fairly thin with regular duties as well as attending regional seminars on emergency management. Emergency planning cannot be conducted in isolated jurisdictions, he said, and so the specialist would work with local and state governments to keep an up-to-date emergency plan and conduct community outreach efforts.

"Someone needs to take regional plans, and fashion them so they will work here," he said.

"From my perspective, this is a no-brainer," said Silverthorne.

Mayor Rob Lederer agreed. "We want to make sure we’re in a position to take care of citizens in the City of Fairfax," he said.

Councilmembers unanimously decided to move forward with the process of creating the emergency management specialist position in the city's fire department. The position, which will cost $85,000 with salary and fringe benefits, is not a uniformed position and so will not be subject to the new pay plan, said Owens.

 

Police officers win 11.5% pay increase in arbitration
From the Anacortes American, February 8, 2006

An arbitrator on Friday ruled in favor of the Anacortes Police Guild in its contract dispute with the City of Anacortes.

In the decision released by Arizona arbitrator Guy Parent, the Anacortes Police officers will receive an 11.5 percent wage increase, their first pay raise since the end of 2003. Under the terms of the award, the officers will begin paying part of their medical premiums, which the Guild had offered to do during contract negotiations. Officers who earn an associate of arts degree will also receive a raise.

“As a whole, I consider it a win ... We received a fair arbitration,’’ said Anacortes Police Services Guild President Lou D’Amelio.

In a statement released by the City of Anacortes, Director of Human Resources Emily Schuh writes, “While the City would have preferred to have settled the bargaining agreement locally as they were able to do with both IAFF 1537 (firefighters) and Teamsters Local 231 (general employees) in 2005, we are not displeased with Mr. Parent’s decisions.’’

The City of Anacortes and the Guild presented their cases to the arbitrator in public hearings last August at the Anacortes Public Library. Among the 11 issues certified for arbitration were municipal court overtime payments, shift bidding, assignments on holidays, sick leave buyback, health and welfare coverage, longevity, shift differential, speciality pay, education incentives and detective clothing allowances.

The Guild represents 28 employees, including 22 police officers and the animal control officer. They’ve been working without a contract since December 2003.

D’Amelio estimates the City of Anacortes spent $100,000 on the litigation, money which could have gone for pay raises for officers.

“I’ve said all along that as a taxpayer, it’s more than disappointing to spend $100,000 on a decision ... The citizens deserve more effort by the city to keep it from going to the arbitrator’s table,’’ he said.

The Guild will renew a previous public records request asking how much the city spent on the litigation, D’Amelio said.

In a release to the press, attorney Jim Cline — who represented the Anacortes Police Guild — said the City of Anacortes had offered a 6.5 percent increase over three years, which is less than current police contract settlements elsewhere.

“There’s a statewide shortage of police officers and it was irresponsible for the city to offer a wage that would make it so out of step with other police agencies,’’ writes Cline, whose law firm represents about 30 police unions in Washington. “Most other settlements are above 3 percent per year. I think the City’s argument had to be puzzling to the arbitrator especially when we showed that the City was in a good fiscal position.’’

But the City of Anacortes believes it prevailed on several points in the agreement.

Schuh writes, “Mr. Parent left several issues unchanged, including municipal court overtime payment, shift bidding practices, and longevity payments. Management now clearly has the ability to determine the number of non-patrol employees who are scheduled to work on holidays, which curbs overtime payments ... The City prevailed in not enhancing the longevity program.’’

 

Town Council ratifies new police contract

The three-year pact gives the officers annual raises of 3 to 3.5 percent.
From the Providence Journal, February 15, 2006

 

WARREN -- The Town Council formally ratified the police contract last night.

 

"I think we have struck a good three-year agreement that will satisfy the needs of both sides, and I think we're all on the same side," said Town Council president Frank Alfano after the council approved the contract in executive session.

 

The new contract, which gives annual raises ranging from 3 to 3.5 percent over three years, is very similar to the old contract, said Town Solicitor Fausto Anguilla, who represented the town along with Anthony DeSisto.

 

Under the agreement, the town is now able to explore health insurance rates from providers other than Blue Cross/Blue Shield, as long as the coverage is equal to or better than the current plan.

 

The police contract also includes language pertaining to pregnant police officers, which is a first for the town, Anguilla said.

 

According to the contract, pregnant police officers are eligible for modified duty assignments more appropriate for their physical capabilities. The officers can continue to work regular or modified schedules as long as they present monthly physicians' certificates.

 

"Assignment to modified duty shall not affect the officer's pay classification, pay increases, promotions, retirement benefits and/or any other benefits [the] employees would normally receive," the contract states.

 

Town officials and Local 470 of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, which represents Warren police officers, reached an informal agreement on the contract Jan. 19.

 

The previous contract expired July 1, and negotiations started last spring. If they weren't resolved by Jan. 20, a third party would have been brought in to mediate.

 

Sgt. Joseph DaSilva Jr., the police union's local representative, said last month that the status of Police Chief Thomas Gordon, whom the town argues stepped out of the union when he was appointed chief in 2001, delayed the agreement.

 

The union says that the chief must sign a three-party agreement with the union and the town before leaving its collective bargaining unit.

 

To further negotiations, the town and the union agreed to let the chief's case, which was presented before the State Labor Relations Board in September, play itself out separately from the police contract.

 

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net