The POLICEPAY Journal®

Thursday, February 9, 2006

POLICEPAY Journal Mailing List (Receive new issues by e-mail)   www.policepay.net  

Matt Barnard, Editor   matt@policepay.net    (405) 234-2235    

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

2006 POLICEPAY INDEX

WHO IS NUMBER 1? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT

 

BREAKING NEWS

 TEAMSTERS CONQUER NASHVILLE

WEST VIRGINIA

Manchin Seeks Millions For Trooper Pay Raises

TEXARKANA, AR

Texarkana Council Agrees To Correct Parity Pay Oversight

BAL HARBOUR, FL

Bal Harbour City, Police Union Agree On New Two-Year Contract

PRESS RELEASE

2006 POLICEPAY Index Just Released!

POLICEPAY.NET

RETIREE’S HEALTH INSURANCE UNDER ATTACK

Look At The Last Issue (2/2/05)

 

TEAMSTERS CONQUER NASHVILLE

From Policepay.net, February 8, 2006 –

 

Nashville, Tennessee –The International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 327, have succeeded in replacing the Fraternal Order of Police as the bargaining agent for the Nashville Metropolitan Police Department.  Today’s election victory culminates a two-year struggle.  During 2004, the Teamsters forced the FOP into a representation election and almost succeeded, but ultimately lost by 16 votes. 

 

To get to today’s representation election, the Teamsters had to prevail in a December 1, 2005 decertification election that required the approval of more than 50% of the qualifying police officers.  The Teamsters managed to jump that hurdle, although there were only 36 votes to spare.

 

Two factors contributed to the Teamsters victory – a disgruntled former president of the FOP and a new police chief.  The origin for both factors was just 11 days apart during January, 2004.  FOP president, Calvin Hullett, completed his term as the FOP president on January 1st.  Less than two weeks, later Ronal Serpas became the new police chief.  These two actions started a series of events that would eventually lead to the FOP being removed and the Teamsters taking over.

 

Hullett completed his FOP presidency as an unhappy person.  He had fought several battles with his executive board and lost.  As a result, he chose not to stand for re-election.  Overnight, he changed from being the chief advocate for the FOP to being the FOP’s chief nemesis.  Hullett’s family has long-term ties with the Teamsters union.  The thought of getting the Teamsters into the Nashville Police Department was not a sudden impulse, but something that had been brewing in his mind for a long time.

 

Ronal Serpas arrived in Nashville after a career with the New Orleans Police Department and then a term as the Chief of the Washington State Police.  Mayor Bill Purcell picked Chief Serpas because of his reputation as an agent of change.  The Nashville Police Department was long overdue for modernization.  The chief wasted no time in implementing changes.  Most of those changes were not trail-blazing ideas.  They were standard police department practices being used by many major police departments.  Unfortunately, Chief Serpas can be a little heavy-handed at times.  As a result, it was not long until he had a vocal group of police officers that were calling for his head.

 

Capitalizing on the discontent with the chief, Hullett began a behind-the-scenes drive to overthrow the FOP and he almost succeeded.  For his reprise performance in 2005, he came out from behind the curtain and began to lead the charge. His campaign focused on how much he and his Teamster buddies despised Chief Serpas.  The only problem with this strategy was that the FOP was saying the same thing.  The FOP had begun an all-out war with the chief not long after he arrived.  The battle between the two unions became an argument about who hated the chief the most.  Eventually, both started to sound like parrots.  You can only take hyperbole to so high a crescendo.

 

The Teamsters then moved on to a new issue – the pension plan.  The Teamsters started accusing the city of messing with the pension plan assets and investments.  This is an area where the Teamsters are universally recognized experts – messing with pension plans.  The Teamsters claimed that the plan had not been audited, which was incorrect.  They then claimed that what they meant was a “performance audit” concerning the return on investments.  The Teamsters even filed a bogus lawsuit in an attempt to force the city into doing a “performance audit.”  The fact is that the pension plan is a defined benefit plan and the employee benefits are fixed.  No employee is helped nor harmed by the return on the pension investments.  Even the 2000 performance audit that the Teamsters frequently referred to stated that the Nashville Metro Plan out-performed the average pension plan.

 

Today’s victory is a major coup for the Teamsters.  Prior to taking Nashville, the largest city police department represented by the Teamsters was Cedar Rapids, Iowa, the 190th largest city in the United States.  Nashville is the 25th largest city.  The raid on the Nashville FOP was more of an opportunistic action by the Teamsters, rather than part of a strategic plan.  With Hullett in place, ready, willing and able to betray his union, and the high level of anger toward the police chief, the opportunity was too good to pass up. 

 

Nashville is not a big labor city where the Teamsters can really benefit from infiltrating the police department, but it is a big foothold.  The Teamsters will probably try to repeat this process by cultivating dissonant police officers in other cities where there is strong animosity toward the police chief and the mayor. 

 

Orlando, Florida is probably a prime target.  Hatred for the mayor has been overwhelming in Orlando.  In addition, the Teamsters are already in a nearby department – Daytona Beach.

 

To really reap any tangible benefits will require the Teamsters to raid police unions in cities where they have stronger ties with organized crime.  Their primary focus will need to be in Chicago, New York, and Philadelphia.

 

Based on their rhetoric, the Teamsters will attempt to use muscle to accomplish their goals.  Whether they succeed in doing this will depend on how Mayor Bill Purcell and Chief Serpas deal with the problem.  If the mayor and chief “roll-over” for the Teamsters after playing hardball with the FOP, it will validate the arguments for using muscle.  In addition, it will energize the Teamsters to try this same approach in other cities.

 

Last week, James P. Hoffa, son of the first Jimmy Hoffa and the current president of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, was in Nashville to address police officers that support the Teamsters in their bid to take over the Nashville Police Department.  Hoffa declared that “Chief Serpas is a bully.  We’ll take care of Chief Serpas.”  It did not sound like he was talking about getting better pay and benefits for the chief. 

 

What motivates police officers to essentially become “suicide bombers” is hard to understand.  Anger and hate are powerful motivators.  Internal strife and turmoil will continue to be the Teamsters’ allies in their drive to dominate law enforcement in this country.  Angry and frustrated police officers can easily fall victim to the Teamsters promise of using the boot heel to accomplish change.

 

There is a lesson in this for the leaders of other police unions.  The fanning of the embers of animosity toward the chief and the mayor may start a prairie fire that eventually consumes you and your union.  As tempting as it may be, playing to your membership by attacking the chief and the mayor offers much more risk than reward.  The art of politics may not be as macho, but it is much more affective.

 

 

Manchin seeks millions for trooper pay raises
From The Associated Press, February 07, 2006

 

Pledging to make state troopers the highest-paid law enforcement officers in West Virginia by the end of his term, Gov. Joe Manchin asked lawmakers to provide $6.2 million worth of raises to the State Police over the next three years.

 

The pay increases would be on top of the $1,350 raise troopers received during last year's special session devoted to public employee pay issues. The proposed raises would also be in addition to the $76.7 million Manchin has recommended for the department for the fiscal year that begins July 1.

 

Manchin spokeswoman Lara Ramsburg said the raises stem from the anti-crime measures the governor outlined in January's State of the State address.

 

"It's one of the components needed to make sure that our troopers have the resources they need to attack crime in West Virginia,'' Ramsburg said Monday.

 

Versions of the bill (HB4410, SB503) were introduced Monday in the House and Senate, and referred to their respective finance committees.

 

Over the three years, the total raises to base pay would range between $2,000 for the ranks of corporal and above to $7,000 for troopers in their second and third years. All classes of troopers would receive raises to their base pay, except for those in their fourth and fifth years of service. Cadets would also get a pay hike.

 

The bill would also boost pay for troopers on the job for two years or more by $400 per year of service. Troopers now receive $600 in extra "longevity pay'' after five years of service, with increases every three years.

 

Troopers now rank seventh for compensation among state law enforcement agencies. Police in Ranson, Charleston, Charles Town and Martinsburg and deputy sheriffs in Kanawha and Jefferson counties all receive higher pay, according to figures cited by Ramsburg.

 

Though lawmakers sought to address pay raises during the September special session, Manchin's bill might still have a chance, House Finance Vice Chairman John Doyle said Monday.

 

"I personally don't think we did as good a job as we could have done on pay raises,'' said Doyle, D-Jefferson. “But the question, as always, is what other priorities are there.''

 

 

 

Arkansas-side council agrees to correct parity pay oversight
From the Texarkana Gazette, February 7, 2006

 

The Texarkana, Ark., Board of Directors agreed to take nearly $95,000 out of the city’s general fund budget to make up for a parity pay misunderstanding.

 

Last month police officers were surprised to find only a 4.5 percent increase on their paychecks, when in previous talks, they understood their raise was to be 6 percent.

 

The 6 percent was made up of 3 percent of what Texas side officials had given their officers and firefighters for the fiscal year 2005-2006 and the other 3 percent was to cover unpaid parity from July to December 2005.

 

However, the finance director, Harold Boldt, said he understood the only amount over the initial 3 percent was 1.5 percent, and if he’d heard 6 percent, he would have at the time it was being discussed raised the issue.

 

Parity pay was approved by Arkansas-side voters more than a decade ago and it gives the Texarkana, Ark., police officers and firefighters the same rate of pay Texarkana, Texas, police officers and firefighters earn. It was to be funded by an increase in the Texarkana, Ark., city sales tax.

 

A meeting of the parity pay committee was called shortly after the misunderstanding arose last month, where it was decided to give an additional 1.5 percent, for a total of 6 percent.

 

“They’re supposed to get a little extra on this check to make up (for the other 1.5 percent not given on the first paycheck of the year),” said Ward 5 Director Weldon Johnson.

 

The additional 1.5 percent will cost the city $94,500 out of its general fund balances.

 

But the city is still 3 percent behind from January 2005, when the city didn’t give the full parity raise the Texas-side officers received for fiscal year 2004-2005.

 

However, the 6 percent raise the Arkansas-side officers are now getting brings them to salary base pay parity with what Texas-side officers are making.

 

City Manager Charles Nickerson acknowledged the city still owes civil service some parity pay, but with the lack of cash flow and low fund balance, it would be fiscally irresponsible to pay that now.

 

Mayor Horace Shipp agreed.

 

“We’re not squeaking that (what is still owed) under the table,” he said, adding, “At the appropriate time, we will approach that 2005 deficiency.”

 

Shipp said that appropriate time will not be until the city is more financially stable and is bringing in more revenues.

 

Both chiefs, Police Chief Bob Harrison and Fire Chief Bobby Honea said they understood what was taking place.

 

Harrison said it was the decision of the Police Association to accept the current offer of 6 percent and work out an agreement for the future to regain that lost parity.

 

Honea noted the fire department had already come to an agreement, worked out with the parity pay committee, with the city on how that unpaid parity would be met in the future after the city has escapes its financial crisis.

 

 

BAL HARBOUR City, police union agree on new two-year contract

From The Miami Herald, February 8, 2006

 

Police officers in Bal Harbour have reached a two-year contract agreement with the village, allowing for stepped raises and pension benefits, while neighboring Bay Harbor Islands is nearing a deal.

 

Under the contract between Bal Harbour and the Police Benevolent Association which was approved at a recent Village Council meeting, the starting annual salary for a Bal Harbour police officer will be $47,058, with maximum salary of $60,346 after 18 years of service. Officers working the 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. shift will be paid an additional 3 percent.

 

Every year, Bal Harbour's police officers will receive a cost-of-living adjustment based on the Consumer Price Index for South Florida.

This year's adjustment would amount to a 4 percent raise. The officers will also receive a 2 ½ percent pay increase after eight years of service, and a 1 percent increase after 16, 17 and 18 years of service.

 

The contract also includes a pension-type program which Bal Harbour Police Chief Tom Hunker explained will allow officers to stay on the job up to five years after they reach retirement age and accrue retirement benefits.

 

The village police force has 30 sworn officers.

 

The contract approval comes after more than a year of negotiations between Hunker and the PBA.

 

''It's a lengthy process, I'm glad it's over,'' Hunker said.

 

The contract will get its final reading at the Council's Feb. 21 meeting.

 

In neighboring Bay Harbor Islands, the town is also close to reaching an agreement with the PBA, said Bay Harbor Islands Police Chief John Ross.

 

''Our contract has been tentatively agreed to, but it has to be ratified by the PBA bargaining unit and then passed by the Town Council,'' Ross said.

 

 

2006 POLICEPAY Index Just Released!

* Austin, Texas is highest paid police department out of 200 largest cities in United States

* New Orleans is still the lowest paid department

* 'Old South' is lowest paid region

* New York City police officers remain toward bottom of the list, ranked 157th out of 200

From PRN Newswire, January 31, 2006

 

OKLAHOMA CITY, Jan. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- POLICEPAY.NET has released the 2006 POLICEPAY Index, ranking the 200 largest cities in the United States based upon police compensation. This index uses a total compensation methodology that breaks down an officer's pay and benefits over a 30-year career into a per hour rate that allows each location to be accurately compared.

 

Produced by Ronald J. York, President of POLICEPAY.NET and a well-known accountant and labor negotiator, this index provides an accurate representation of police wages and benefits across the country. Over the years, our index has become widely used by government agencies and police unions for determining market values, individual police recruits looking for a department to apply to, and reporters covering stories regarding police wages and benefits.

 

The full 2006 POLICEPAY Index is available at no charge for download at http://www.policepay.net/ , or can be requested by email at editor@policepay.net, or by fax at (405) 234-2245. Custom data reports are also available for members of the media upon request to compare individual types of compensation.

 

POLICEPAY.NET is the nation's leading collective bargaining consultant for police associations. We have been serving associations all across the nation since 1987 providing collective bargaining services. In addition to services for individual police unions, we also own and maintain the Web site http://www.policepay.net/ , the leading resource for police compensation data available anywhere.

 

CONTACT: Charles Wonsey POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. (405) 234-2235 FAX: (405) 234-2245 charles@policepay.net http://www.policepay.net/

Website: http://www.policepay.net/

 

 

 

BACK ISSUES OF THE JOURNAL

 

 

Copyright ã POLICEPAY.NET, Inc. 2006 All Rights Reserved

 

 

The POLICEPAY Journal

Published by:

POLICEPAY.NET, Inc.

211 North Robinson Ave, Suite 350

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

(405) 234-2235

www.policepay.net